JUDGMENT : Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J. 1. The appellant was convicted for commission of offence punishable under Sections 376/323/506 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years and to pay fine of Rs. 25,000/-, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year. 2. The learned advocate appearing for the appellant submits that the appellant has already been served out the sentence. 3. The crux of the allegations against the appellant is to the effect that on 30th day of March, 2012 at about 5.30 A.M. when Manju Bar aged about 17 years, went to attend natures call on the back side of their house at a mango garden, then the accused Tanu Singha, son of Abhiram Singha of same locality caught hold of her and raped her. Over the incident Harishchandrapur P.S. Case No. 143/12 dated 30th day of March, 2012 under Section 376/511/323/506 of the Indian Penal Code was registered against Tanu Singha. Appellant was arrested in the course of investigation and medical examination was conducted on the victim girl and rape was confirmed. 4. From the evidence on record, it appears that the appellant was identified not only by the victim girl P.W. 2 but also by her mother Protima Roy P.W. 1 who tried to resist the appellant but was assaulted by the accused Tanu Singha by bricks. Apart from the evidences of P.W. 1 & P.W. 2, P.W. 4 Dr. Partha Sarathi Chakraborty found not only abrasions and bruises in the victim's hymen but also found the hymen freshly raptured. The doctor also stated about multiple abrasion and bruises over the right side of the forehead and upper part of the face of the victim showing forcible rape committed by the accused upon the victim. In view of the aforesaid evidence on record, the conviction and sentence of the appellant do not call for interference. 5. The appeal is, thus, dismissed. 6. The period of detention suffered by the appellant during investigation, enquiry or trial shall be set off against the substantive sentence imposed upon him under section 428 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure. 7. Copy of the judgment along with LCR be sent down to the trial court at once for necessary compliance. 8. Urgent Photostat Certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied expeditiously after complying with all necessary legal formalities.