Research › Browse › Judgment

Supreme Court of India · body

2018 DIGILAW 903 (SC)

Ranjan Sharma v. Dipti Malakar

2018-05-15

R.BANUMATHI, RANJAN GOGOI

body2018
ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. We have heard the learned counsels for the parties. 3. This appeal is by the owner of the motor vehicle involved in the accident in question in respect of which compensation has been awarded payable by the appellant. The appellant seeks to challenge the order of the High Court of Tripura in a review petition affirming the order of the High Court dismissing for default the appeal filed by the appellant against the order of the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kailashahar, North Tripura (“Tribunal” for short) by which the liability to pay compensation of Rs.3,33,000/-has been fastened on the appellant as the owner of the vehicle. 4. The above order has been passed by the learned Tribunal as the proceedings therein against the appellant had gone ex parte and the learned Tribunal held that as the driving licence had not been laid before the learned Tribunal the liability ought to be fastened on the owner of the vehicle. The appeal against the said Award of the learned Tribunal filed by the owner of the vehicle, as noted above, was dismissed for default. The review petition was filed by the appellant before the High Court seeking recall of the aforesaid order. Along with the review petition a copy of the insurance policy and the driving licence was enclosed. 5. The High Court, however, refused to consider the review petition. Hence the present appeal. 6. Having considered the matter and taking into account the fact that the insurance policy and the driving licence was laid before the High Court we are of the view that the same ought to have been taken on record and appropriate orders should have been passed. As the High Court failed to so act the order of the High Court is liable to be corrected which we accordingly do. 7. Taking into account the insurance policy insuring the vehicle for a period during which the accident had occurred and the driving licence of the driver which appears to be in order we allow this appeal and set aside the order of the High Court and direct that the compensation amount be paid by the Insurer to the person(s) entitled. The amount ordered to be deposited in this Court, if not withdrawn by the claimant(s), shall be returned to be appellant along with interest, if any, forthwith upon due verification. The amount ordered to be deposited in this Court, if not withdrawn by the claimant(s), shall be returned to be appellant along with interest, if any, forthwith upon due verification. If the aforesaid amount has been withdrawn by the claimant(s) necessary adjustment(s) will be made by the Insurer including return of such amount to the appellant. The amount of compensation shall be paid by the Insurer to the claimant(s) within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 8. The appeal is disposed of in the above terms.