JUDGMENT : 1. These four appeals in MFA Nos.2699/2014, 2696/2014, 2697/2014 and 2700/2014 by the appellants lay a challenge to the common judgment and multiple awards dated 24.01.2014 made by the MACT, Hosadurga, allowing MVC.Nos.324/2009, 325/2009, 234/2009 and 342/2009 respectively, whereby the different sums of compensation with interest at the rate of 6% per annum subject to a usual condition of bank deposit have been awarded. The challenge is on the ground of the liability. 2. The brief facts of the case as to the happening of the accident of 01.03.2009 because of rash and negligent driving of the offending TATA ACE bearing Registration No.KA-A-9855 and consequential injuries to the claimants are not in dispute. The MACT after looking to the pleadings of the parties and after assessing the evidentiary material on record has made this award fastening the liability on the insurer. 3. The learned panel counsel for the insurer raised a question of law as to the liability of the insurer in the absence of the transport endorsement on the driving license of the driver of the offending vehicle. The learned counsel for the claimant cites the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Mukund Dewangan Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., AIR 2017 SC 3668 , for repelling the contention of the insurer. 4. The question raised by the insurer is no longer resintegra; the same has been answered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the decision supra holding that the insurer is liable even when there is no transport endorsement. 5. In view of the above, no other ground having been urged, the appeals being devoid of merit, stand dismissed. Dismissal of these appeals will not come in the way of claimants to prosecute their appeals for the enhancement of compensation. The amount in deposit, along with the LCR shall be transmitted to the jurisdictional MACT, for being disbursed as compensation to the claimants, forthwith. Costs made easy.