Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2019 DIGILAW 1006 (RAJ)

Vijaypal v. State of Rajasthan, Through PP

2019-04-03

VIJAY BISHNOI

body2019
JUDGMENT 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record. 2. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 01/2018 of Police Station Gangrar, District Chittorgarh for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15, 25 and 29 of NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is clear from the statement of Chena Ram (PW-2), the then S.H.O. of Police Station Gangrar, Distt. Chittorgarh that 4 bags containing poppy husk were seized by the police and the Seizure Officer took out the poppy husk from all the four bags and mixed the said poppy husk on a tarpaulin and thereafter took two samples of 500 gms each from that mixture. Thus, it is clear that the Seizure Officer did not collect separate samples from each bag. It is also submitted that the I.O. has not stated that the test by the U.N. Kit was carried out on each bag before taking small quantity of poppy husk for samples. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner while placing reliance on the decision of this Court rendered in the case of Netram v. State of Rajasthan, reported in 2014 (1) Cr.L.R. (Raj.) 163 has argued that this Court has held that if the samples from each bag containing poppy husk/poppy straw have not been collected and test by U.N. Kit has not been conducted on each bag and if the Seizure Officer has taken out some quantity of narcotic drug from each bag and after mixing the same has taken out some portion for sample, then, the same is not in conformity with the Standing Instruction No. 1/88 issued by the Narcotics Control Bureau, New Delhi, particularly, Instruction No. 1.7 and, as such, it cannot be said that the narcotic contraband recovered in the matter is of commercial quantity or above. It is, thus, prayed that the petitioner may kindly be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 6. It is, thus, prayed that the petitioner may kindly be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 6. Having considered the overall facts and circumstances of the case and substantial grounds taken in this bail application and taking into consideration the judgment passed by this Court in Netrams case (supra) and taking into consideration the fact that trial of the case is likely to take time, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Vijaypal S/o Ramjas shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 01/2018 of Police Station Gangrar, District Chittorgarh provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.