Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2019 DIGILAW 1199 (RAJ)

Subhash v. State of Rajasthan

2019-04-23

ARUN BHANSALI

body2019
JUDGMENT 1. A copy of the writ petition has been supplied to Ms. Rekha Borana, learned AAG appearing for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner raising issues pertaining to the recruitment for the post of Safai Karamchari by the Municipal Corporation, Jodhpur. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the issues raised in the present writ petition are squarely covered by the judgment in Ravi Jajot & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : SBCWP No. 10496/2018, decided on 30.08.2018, wherein even for the issues, which are not covered by the judgment, it was directed that the petitioners therein would represent before the respondents and a further direction has been given for consideration by a proper redressal committee. 4. It is further submitted that pursuant to the said direction, a redressal committee has been constituted by order dated 27.09.2018 by the respondents and therefore, in light of the said judgment and constitution of the committee, the petitioner may also approach the said committee with the grievances as raised in the present writ petition. 5. In the case of Ravi Jajot (supra), it was directed as under:- "92. Before parting with this judgment, this Court makes it clear that any issue other than the issues dealt with by this Court in this judgment, which remains open, shall be represented by the petitioners to the respondents, and the respondents shall decide all those factual and legal issues by passing a respective speaking order in the cases of the petitioners, after giving them proper opportunity of hearing, strictly in accordance with law, as it is not possible for this Court to go into individual facts of individual petitioner in such exercise, and therefore, this Court directs the respondents to pass lawful and speaking orders in all those matters. 93. It is further made clear that the petitioners, whose issues have not been dealt with by this Court in this judgment, shall have the liberty to approach this Court again, after the respective representations are decided by the respondents, if so advised. 94. Such issues shall be decided by the respondents through a proper Redressal Committee to be constituted by the respondents themselves, in pursuance of aforesaid direction contained in this judgment, at the appropriate level, within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment." 6. 94. Such issues shall be decided by the respondents through a proper Redressal Committee to be constituted by the respondents themselves, in pursuance of aforesaid direction contained in this judgment, at the appropriate level, within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment." 6. In view of the above directions and the fact that a committee has been constituted, the writ petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of with similar directions as given in the case of Ravi Jajot (supra).