Research › Search › Judgment

Madhya Pradesh High Court · body

2019 DIGILAW 128 (MP)

Gita Devi v. Maan Singh

2019-02-07

ROHIT ARYA

body2019
ORDER : Rohit Arya, J. 1. The miscellaneous appeal under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short 'the Act') is directed against the award dated 30.4.2016 passed in claim case No. 86/2014 by Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jhabua. 2. Facts relevant and necessary for disposal of this appeal lie in narrow compass: on 13.2.2014, the deceased (Devilal) and his wife while going from Jhabua to Village Jamali on motorcycle met with an accident due to rash and negligent driving of respondent No. 1, as the offending vehicle tractor bearing registration No. MP 45 AA 2672 hit his motorcycle from behind, as a result, the deceased (Devilal) suffered grievous injuries on various parts of the body including his head and died on the spot. 3. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the claimant submits that at the time of incident, the deceased earning Rs. 16,750 by doing job in a Govt. Hospital. Because of the incident, he met untimely death. The family is reeling under most precarious financial constraints and also suffered the loss of love and affection of the deceased. 4. The claimants/appellants have challenged the amount of compensation awarded by the Tribunal on the premise that the compensation awarded is meagre and on the lower side on various heads and even future prospects of the deceased have not been awarded appropriately. Hence, the compensation has to be enhanced. 5. Learned Counsel for the Insurance Company has supported the impugned award. On merits, it is submitted that looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the amount awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper and no enhancement is called for. Hence the liability is not disputed. Accordingly, prayed for dismissal of the appeal. 6. It is established from the material available on record that the accident took place by the offending vehicle and the offending vehicle was duly insured with the respondent/Insurance Company. The deceased suffered grievous injuries in the accident in question and died on the spot. 7. The moot question to be addressed upon in the appeal preferred by the claimants is as to whether the Tribunal was justified awarding Rs. 22,61,250 towards loss of earning, Rs. 25,000 funeral expenses, Rs. 20,000 towards loss of love and affection and Rs. 1,00,000 towards consortium.; total compensation of Rs. 24,06,250. 8. 7. The moot question to be addressed upon in the appeal preferred by the claimants is as to whether the Tribunal was justified awarding Rs. 22,61,250 towards loss of earning, Rs. 25,000 funeral expenses, Rs. 20,000 towards loss of love and affection and Rs. 1,00,000 towards consortium.; total compensation of Rs. 24,06,250. 8. Having gone through the impugned award and looking to the fact that deceased was 38 of age on the date of accident, loss of earning/dependency and his future prospects have not been assessed properly. Hence, in the opinion of this Court, the amount awarded by the Tribunal is on the lower side and needs to be enhanced appropriately. 9. Heard. 10. The finding of the Tribunal as regards earning of the deceased as determined is reasonable. In the obtaining facts and circumstances as the deceased was supporting his family by earning, the income of deceased is assessed as Rs. 2,01,000 per annum. The Tribunal has not awarded under the head 'future prospects'. Hence, the amount of compensation has to be awarded under the said head. Keeping in mind the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in VII (2017) SLT 707 : IV (2017) ACC 460 (SC) : 2017 ACJ 2700 , National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi and Others and the age of the deceased as 38 years, the claimants are entitled for Rs. 2,81,400 (including future prospects) after deduction of 1/4 towards personal expenses), it comes to Rs. 2,11,050 (2,81,400 - 70,350). Hence, the multiplier 15 is appropriate multiplier; Rs. 2,11,050 x 15 = total dependency comes to Rs. 31,65,750. 11. The Tribunal has awarded the compensation on the heads as follows: (i) towards loss of earning Rs.22,61,250 (ii) towards funeral expenses Rs. 25,000 (iii) towards loss of love & affection Rs.20,000 (iv) Towards consortium Rs.1,00,000 Total Rs.24,06,250 12. Bearing in mind the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of National Insurance Company Limited (supra) and to meet the ends of justice, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is substituted and the claimants are entitled for just compensation as follows: (i) Towards loss of earning Rs.31,65,750 (ii) towards conventional heads Rs.70,000 Total Rs.32,35,750 13. As such, the total amount awarded to the claimants is from Rs. 24,06,250 to Rs. 32,35,750, the enhanced amount comes to Rs. As such, the total amount awarded to the claimants is from Rs. 24,06,250 to Rs. 32,35,750, the enhanced amount comes to Rs. 8,29,500-(Rupees Eight Lakh Twenty Nine Thousand Five Hundred only), with interest at the rate as fixed by the Tribunal in the award which is ordered accordingly to be payable to the claimants as directed by the Tribunal in the same apportionment. The enhanced amount of compensation Rs. 8,29,500 shall be payable to the claimants within 12 weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. Rest of the award impugned passed by the Tribunal shall remain intact. 14. If the enhanced amount of compensation is in excess to the valuation of appeal, the difference of the Court fee (if not already paid) shall be deposited by the appellant within four weeks from today and proof thereof shall be submitted before the Registry. Thereafter Registry shall issue the certified copy of the order passed today. 15. Appeal stands allowed to the aforesaid extent and disposed of.