Suresh Chand Meena v. State of Rajasthan, Through P. P.
2019-05-02
INDERJEET SINGH
body2019
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 13/2019 registered at Police Station Peeplu, District Tonk for the offences under Sections 379, 120-B of I.P.C. & under section 4/21 of MMRD Act. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the offences alleged against the petitioner are triable by Magistrate. Counsel further submits that the petitioner has not been named in the FIR and recovery has already been effected from the petitioner. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 4. Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the petitioner and taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Peeplu, District Tonk in F.I.R. No. 13/2019 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Suresh Chand Meena S/o Shri Jagdish Meena, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.