Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2019 DIGILAW 1492 (RAJ)

Makhan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

2019-05-14

VIJAY BISHNOI

body2019
JUDGMENT 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record. 2. The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No. 88/2009 of Police Station Hanumangarh Town, District Hanumangarh for the offence punishable under Section 3/25 of Arms Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that due to unavoidable circumstances the petitioner could not attend the hearing before the trial court. It is submitted that the petitioner will attend all the hearings before the trial court regularly in future. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 6. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner - Makhan Singh S/o Gurdayal Singh shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 88/2009 of Police Station Hanumangarh Town, District Hanumangarh provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.