JUDGMENT : A.S. BOPANNA, J. 1. Heard Ms. P. Barman, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. D. Chutia, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. The instant application is filed by the applicant/appellant seeking condonation of delay of 58 days in filing the accompanying appeal bearing Mat. Appeal No.63 of 2018. 3. Notice of the application was ordered to the respondent, who is served and represented. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent would contend that the reason as assigned in the application seeking condonation of delay has not been substantiated by sufficient documents and, in that view, the reason assigned cannot be considered as sufficient cause for condonation of delay. 5. In the background of the objection put forth, we have perused the reason assigned in the application. It is seen that the appellant has stated that she was suffering from chickenpox and, as such, has been prevented from moving around and, therefore, could not take appropriate steps to file the appeal within time. Though no documentary evidence is produced, taking into consideration the nature of the illness pleaded, such document in any event cannot be expected. 6. Be that as it may, the instant appeal is filed against the judgment of the Court below whereby the marriage between the parties has been dissolved. In such circumstance, in any event, the appellant/applicant would not be benefited by deliberately delaying the matter. If these aspects are kept in view, we are of the opinion that the delay is liable to be condoned. 7. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay is allowed and delay is condoned.