JUDGMENT 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking re- scheduling/re-conducting of the Physical Efficiency Test (PET). 2. It is, inter alia, indicated in the writ petition that pursuant to the Constable Recruitment, 2018 the petitioner after having cleared the written examination participated in the PET held on 06.09.2018 at Ajmer. It is claimed that the petitioner was required to report at 06:00 AM when she reported for PST and at about 01:30 PM the PET was held. It is claimed that as the petitioner was called at 06:00 AM and thereafter PET was held at 01:30 PM, the petitioner could not perform to her potential and failed in the PET and, therefore, the petitioner may be accorded one more opportunity. 3. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and have perused the material available on record. 4. The PET of the petitioner was held on 06.09.2018. Whereafter a so called undated representation Annexure-5 has been annexed with the writ petition, however, as to whether the same was delivered and when the same was delivered has not been indicated and the present writ petition has been filed on 19.12.2018. 5. The very fact that the petitioner has questioned holding of the PET after a passage of over three months clearly indicates that the petition has been filed as an after thought. 6. Besides the above, the allegations made in the petition/grounds raised do not make out a case for ordering for another PET for the petitioner. It has already been noticed in several cases that the PET for the candidates during the Constable Recruitment was held in batches and merely because the petitioner was included in a batch who underwent the test at 01:30 PM, it cannot be said that the petitioner had any disadvantage on account of being part of such a batch, which resulted in her failing in PET. 7. In view of the above discussion, there is no substance in the writ petition and the same is, therefore, dismissed.