JUDGMENT 1. I.A. NO.2060 of 2019 1. Dr.H.Waris, learned counsel has been assigned the case by the Jharkhand High Court Legal Services Committee, Nyaya Sadan, Doranda, Ranchi to appear on behalf of the appellant. Office shall mention the name of Dr.H.Waris as an Advocate appearing on behalf of the appellant, in the cause list. 2. This interlocutory application has been filed under Section 389(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, for suspension of the sentence and enlarging the appellant on bail, during the pendency of the present appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that though the Investigating Officer has stated that the alleged weapon (Khanti) has been recovered on the confessional statement of the appellant but the independent witnesses have not testified about recovery of the weapon on the basis of confessional statement of the appellant. It is argued that, in fact, there is no eye witness to the occurrence and all the witnesses are hearsay. 4. Learned A.P.P. has submitted that P.W.1 is the sole eye witness and he has stated about the assault by the appellant on the deceased when he had intervened to pacify the ongoing quarrel and scuffle between the appellant and his wife. The doctor(P.W.9) has found ante-mortem lacerated injury on the forehead and on right occipital region of head of the deceased. 5. Heard. Considering the medical report and the testimony of the eye witness(P.W.1) we do not think it a proper case for suspending the sentence and grant of bail to the appellant. 6. In the result, I.A. NO.2060 of 2019 stands rejected. 7. The appellant is at liberty to renew the prayer for bail if the appeal is not taken up for hearing within one year. 8. Office shall prepare the neatly typed copies of paper books as per Rules 190 and 191 of Jharkhand High Court Rules,2001 and list this appeal under the heading ''for hearing'' in its usual course, as per age of custody.