Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2019 DIGILAW 1660 (RAJ)

Narsa Ram v. State of Rajasthan

2019-05-27

MANOJ KUMAR GARG

body2019
JUDGMENT : 1. The matter comes up on application for early hearing of the misc. petition. 2. For the reason stated in the application, the application is allowed. 3. The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the petitioners for seeking permission for compromise in Criminal Regular Case No. 856/2014 for offence under Sections 384 and 385 of IPC. 4. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has already been compromised between the parties and it is borne out from the compromise that respondents No. 2 not inclined to proceed further in the matter. Counsel has placed reliance on a decision of Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & Anr. [ (2012) 10 SCC 303 ]. In these circumstances, the criminal proceedings against the respondents No. 2 against the petitioners in offence under Sections 384, 385 of IPC may be quashed. 5. Counsel for the respondents No. 2 complainants concurs the fact of compromise and submits that in view of the compromise, the respondents No. 2 does not want to proceed further in the matter. 6. In this regard, a compromise deed has been submitted by the parties and the same is hereby taken on record. 7. In view of compromise arrived at between the parties and applying the ratio in decision of Gian Singh (Supra), I deem it just and proper to invoke inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. 8. Accordingly, the present misc. petition is allowed and the criminal proceedings in Criminal Regular Case No. 856/2014 for offence under Sections 384 and 385 of IPC against the petitioners is hereby quashed on the basis of compromise deed. 9. Stay petition also disposed of accordingly.