JUDGMENT : BISWANATH SOMADDER, J. 1. By consent of the parties, the appeal is treated as on day's list and taken up for consideration along with the connected application. 2. The instant appeal arises out of a judgment and order dated 28th August, 2018, passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P. 24132 (W) of 2014 (Anil Chorone Roquitte Ors. vs. The State of West Bengal & Ors.). By the said impugned judgment and order, the learned Single Judge proceeded to dismiss the writ petition for reasons stated therein. 3. Now, the present appeal has been preferred by the writ petitioners. 4. A bare perusal of the impugned judgment and order reveals that the learned Single Judge has supplied cogent and justifiable reasons as to why he was not minded to interfere in the matter. It further appears that there is an element of a private dispute between the appellants/writ petitioners on one hand and Sunit Chorone Roquitte, being the private respondent, on the other. 5. In an Intra-Court Mandamus Appeal, interference is usually warranted only when the palpable infirmities or perversities are noticed. On a plain reading of the impugned judgment and order, we do not notice any such palpable infirmity or perversity. 6. In such circumstances, the appeal and the connected application are liable to be dismissed and stand accordingly dismissed.