JUDGMENT : BISWANATH SOMADDER, J. 1. By consent of the parties, the appeal is treated as on day's list and taken up for consideration along with the application for appropriate order. 2. The instant appeal arises out of an order dated 10th February, 2017, passed by a learned Single Judge in WP 23560 (W) of 2015 (Chhutumunu Majhi vs. Union of India & Ors.). By the said order, the writ petition stood dismissed for reasons stated therein. 3. The instant appeal has been preferred by the writ petitioner. 4. For convenience, the impugned order is reproduced herein-below in its entirety:- "By an order dated August 9, 2016, it was noted that there was no explanation for the inordinate delay in preferring the writ petition. On the prayer of learned advocate for the petitioner, time to file supplementary affidavit was granted. Till date, the petitioner has not filed any supplementary affidavit. In such circumstances, no fruitful purpose will be sub-served by keeping the writ petition pending. W.P. No. 23560 (W) of 2015 is dismissed. There shall, however, be no order as to costs." 5. Even a bare perusal of the impugned order, as reproduced hereinabove, does not reveal any palpable infirmity or perversity which would warrant any interference in an Intra-Court Mandamus Appeal. Cogent reasons have been supplied by the learned Single Judge for the purpose of justifying dismissal of the writ petition. 6. For reasons stated above, the appeal is liable to be dismissed and is accordingly dismissed along with the application for appropriate order. 7. Urgent photostat certified copy of this judgment, if applied for, be given to the learned advocates for the parties. I agree. - (Arindam Mukherjee, J.)