JUDGMENT Sureshwar Thakur, J. - The defendant becoming aggrieved, from, the concurrently recorded verdicts, hence, initially by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) Baijnath, District Kangra, H.P., upon, Civil Suit No. 64 of 2012, and, latter by the learned first Appellate Court, upon, Civil Appeal No. 12-B/XIII/2014, (i) wherethroughs, the plaintiff''s suit, for, rendition, of, a decree of possession, vis-a-vis, the suit property, hence become decreed, (ii) has, thereagainst instituted, the instant appeal, before this Court, rather, for his, striving therethrough, hence, beget reversals, of, the afore made concurrent decrees, against him, and, vis-a-vis, the suit property. 2. Xxx XXX XXX 3. The contesting litigants, do not wrangle, vis-a-vis, the factum, vis-a-vis, the defendant paying rent, to, the plaintiffs, vis-a-vis, the suit property. For, terminating, the, apt tenancy, as, became created, vis-a-vis, the suit premises, qua the defendant, hence, by the plaintiffs, the latters issued, the, apposite statutory notice, as, borne in Ext. PW-7/A, (a) and, therewith stood appended RAD receipt, as, embodied in Ext. PW7/B, and, whereto the defendant meted, a, reply, reply whereof, is embodied in Ext. PW-7/C. Since the statutory mode, for, terminating, the, apt tenancy, created vis-a-vis, the suit premises, by the plaintiffs qua the defendant, has, becoming proven, through, the apposite statutory notice, hence becoming served, upon, the defendant and whereupons it begets hence termination, (b) thereupon, the defendant after the termination of tenancy, created qua him, vis-a-vis, the suit premises, hence by the plaintiffs, rather unauthorizedly, holds hence possession, of, the suit premises, (c) thereupon, the suit for possession became amenable, to become decreed, as, aptly done, by both, the learned courts below. 4. 4. However, the learned counsel, for, the aggrieved defendant, has, made a vigor submission, before this Court, (a) that, since subsequent to the institution, of, the suit, the area, wherewithin the suit premises are located, are, falling within, the, domain of the municipal area concerned, (b) thereupon, the recoursable remedy, vis-a-vis, the plaintiffs, for, seeking the eviction, of, the defendant, from, the demised premises, became constituted, in the apt provisions, as, embodied in the H.P. Rent Control Act hence becoming recoursed, (c) and, hence he contends, that, the extant suit, rather becoming misconstituted, and, also the concurrent decrees, pronounced against the defendant, becoming stained, with, an, illegality, however, the afore submission cannot become accepted, by this Court, (d) as in contemporaneity, vis-a-vis, the issuance, of, the apt termination, of, tenancy, rather statutory notice, as, embodied in Ext. PW-7/A, and, with notice whereof, becoming evidently served, and, also become replied, by the defendant, hence thereat, rather the suit premises became evidently, not, located within the area, falling within the domain(s), of, the municipal area(s) concerned, (e) nor, also thereat hence, the apt recoursable remedy, available vis-a-vis, the plaintiffs, became the one, constituted in the apt therewith provisions, as, embodied in the H.P. Rent Control Act, nor, hence the extant suit become misconstituted. Furthermore, the predominant reasons, for, making the afore inference become sparked, from, the factum, qua with the apposite statutory mode, for, terminating, the, tenancy created, vis-a-vis, the suit premises, by the plaintiffs, vis-a-vis, the defendant, becoming aptly pleaded, and, also becoming proven, to, become served, upon, the defendant, (f) and, when thereupon the afore termination, hence occurred, and, and, when the afore termination rather occurred, prior to the, area, wherewithin the suit premises rather occur, hence becoming, a, part of, the domain(s), of, the municipal area(s) concerned, thereupon also the afore argument(s), looses, its vigor, and, strength. 5. In aftermath, the concurrently recorded decree(s), as, rendered by, both the, learned courts below, are, well warranted, and apt, and, do not warrant, any, interference, from, this Court. 6. The above discussion, unfolds, qua the conclusion(s), as arrived by the learned first appellate Court, being based, upon, a proper, and, mature appreciation, of, evidence on record. Accordingly, no questions, of law, much less, any, substantial question of law, arises, for, determination, by this Court. 7. 6. The above discussion, unfolds, qua the conclusion(s), as arrived by the learned first appellate Court, being based, upon, a proper, and, mature appreciation, of, evidence on record. Accordingly, no questions, of law, much less, any, substantial question of law, arises, for, determination, by this Court. 7. In view of the above discussion, the instant appeal, is, dismissed, and, the judgment, and, decree impugned, before this Court, is, affirmed, and, maintained. Decree sheet be prepared accordingly. All pending applications also stand disposed of. No order as to costs. Records be sent back forthwith.