ORDER 1. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellant - accused and the learned counsel appearing for the State of Uttar Pradesh at length today. 2. This is a case where both the Courts concurrently convicted the accused- appellant herein under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him for life imprisonment. The appellant is the sole accused in this case. 3. According to the prosecution, the appellant - accused has stabbed on the chest of the deceased with scissors. P.W. 1, who is the brother of the deceased, has seen the incident. The prosecution in support of the allegations examined P.W.2 and P.W.3, who later on did not support the story of the prosecution and were declared hostile. 4. P.W. 14 - Inspector B.S.F., who was on duty, took the deceased to the Hospital. Dr. P.K. Jain (PW 12), who conducted the post-mortem opined that injury was caused by a Scissor. Before his death, the deceased told P.W.-14 that the present - appellant has stabbed him with scissors. 5. Moreover there being a strong motive and the First Information Report was lodged immediately after the incident by P.W. 1. Both the Courts have concurrently and rightly held that the case falls under Section 302 of the IPC and convicted the appellant. 6. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and carefully perusing the material evidence available on record, we see that there is no ground to interfere in the concurrent findings of the Courts below and no perversity is found in the order passed by the High Court. 7. However, learned counsel appearing for the appellant brought to our notice that the appellant has almost completed more than ten years incarceration without any remission. 8. Under the circumstances, we direct the State of U.P. to consider the appellant s case as per Jail Manual and Remission Rules and if the appellant is entitled for release, his case may be considered expeditiously. 9. With the above observations, the appeal is dismissed.