JUDGMENT : Dinesh Mehta, J. 1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the action of the respondent Mandi in allotting it a smaller size of plot for construction of shop alleging it to be discriminatory and thus, violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. 2. Before adverting to the rival contentions, it would be appropriate to lay requisite factual backdrop, which led to allotment of these plots to the petitioner as well as the respondents nos. 5 to 10 at Bhadwasia. 3. A Mandi known as Savitri Bai Fulle Krishi Upaj Mandi (Fal Sabji), Jodhpur (hereinafter referred to as Paota Mandi) is situated at Paota adjacent to Roadways Bus Stand. With the growth of the city, it became necessary that the bus stand at Paota be expanded, hence, the State Government, in pursuance of the directions issued in a PIL, decided to shift the present Mandi at Paota to Bhadwasia and give the land held by Paota Mandi to RSRTC for expansion of the bus stand. Initially, the Mandi at Paota accommodated licensees of all kinds of vegetables and fruits as well, however, in the year 1993, it was decided to shift licensees of onion, potato and fruits to a new Mandi at Bhadwasia. In this process the licensee of such commodities shifted to new Mandi at Bhadwasia in the year 1995, leaving only wholesale traders of vegetables (other than onion potato) and some left out traders of fruits to continue with their business at Paota Mandi. 4. In the year 2013, after long deliberations, a high level meeting of various wings of the State Government was convened under the aegis of Addl. Chief Secretary, Urban Housing and Development Department and after thorough discussions on 7.2.2013, it was decided that the present licensees carrying on business at Paota would be shifted to Bhadwasia and the land of Paota Mandi would be handed over to RSRTC, while the land of RSRTC (depot) existing near the Bhadwasia Mandi would be handed over to Krishi Upaj Mandi for establishment/development of new fruit and vegetable Mandis. 5. 5. It will not be out of context to reproduce the relevant decisions taken at the State Level meeting headed by the Chief Secretary of the State on 25.2.2012 and the above referred meeting held on 14.2.2013, which runs as under:- ^^1- mijksDr fo"k; esa iwoZ esa eq[; lfpo egksn; dh v/;{krk esa fnukad 25-06-12 dks ,d cSBd vk;ksftr dh xbZ Fkh ftlesa ;g fu.kZ; fy;k x;k Fkk fd & v- xkS.ke.Mh ;kMZ Q-l- ikoVk tks/kiqj dh O;olkf;d nqdkuksa ,oa fdlku Hkou dks NksM+rs gq, 'ks"k miyC/k 17 ch?kk 5 fcLok Hkwfe esa ls 12 ch?kk 5 fcLok Hkwfe] tks orZeku cl LVS.M ls yxrh gqbZ gS] jktLFkku jkT; iFk fuxe dks gLrkUrfjr dh tk;sxhA c- mDr 17 ch?kk 5 fcLok Hkwfe esa ls 12 ch?kk 5 fcLok Hkwfe jktLFkku jkT; iFk ifjogu fuxe dks gLrkUrfjr fd;s tkus ds i'pkr 'ks"k Hkwfe dk tks/kiqj fodkl izkf/kdj.k ds ek/;e ls ¼fu/kkZfjr deh'ku ij½ O;olkf;d iz;kstukFkZ uhykeh ds ek/;e ls foØ; fd;k tk;sxkA blls izkIr gksus okyh jkf'k dk mi;ksx e.Mh lfefr }kjk vkoafVr Hkwfe dh dher ds Hkqxrku ,oa gLrkUrj.k i'pkr Qy lCth e.Mh ds fodkl dk;ksZa gsrq fd;k tk ldsxkA 2- fnukad 03-12-2012 dks izeq[k 'kklu lfpo] d`f"k dh v/;{krk esa bl fo”k; esa ,d cSBd vk;ksftr dh x;h FkhA bl cSBd esa ppkZ ds nkSjku ;g rF; lkeus vk;s Fks fd orZeku esa d`f"k mit e.Mh lfefr dks uo e.Mh izkax.k esa LFkkukUrfjr fd;s tkus ds fy, vpy lEifr vkoaVu uhfr 2005 esa izfØ;k fu/kkZfjr dh gqbZ gSA izFke gLrkUrj.k izFke pj.k ds vkoaVu izfØ;k ds rgr fd;k tkrk gSA izFke pj.k ds vkoaVu esa dsoy ,sls d oxZ nyky] la;qDr O;kikjh] O;kikjh oxZ ds vuqKki=/kkjh gh vkoaVu ds ik= gksaxs tks fd v?kksf"kr fd;s tkus okys e.Mh izkax.k ,oa ekdsZV ,fj;k esa vofLFkr gks ,oa O;olk; dj jgs gks rFkk fu/kkZfjr izfØ;k ds rgr vkoaVu ds ik= gksA orZeku izdj.k tks/kiqj 'kgj ds lqO;ofLFkr fodkl ,oa ifjogu O;oLFkk dks lq/kkjus dh n`f"V ls fØ;kUofr dh tkus okyh ikoVk cl LVs.M foLrkj ,oa fodkl izkstsDV ls lacaf/kr gSA cl LVs.M ds foLrkj ,oa fodkl ds fy, ikoVk fLFkr xkS.ke.Mh ;kMZ ¼Q-l-½ dks gLrkUrfjr fd;k tk jgk gS blfy, ;gka O;kikj dj jgs vkoaVh O;olkf;;ksa] ftuds ikl bl e.Mh ;kMZ esa nqdkusa iwoZ esa fdjk;s@yht ij vkoafVr gS] dks LFkkukUrfjr fd;s tk jgh txg ij lqfuf'pr vkoaVu fd;k tkuk vko';d gSA bl igyw dks ns[krs ftlesa fuEu fcUnqvksa ij lgefr gqbZ Fkh%& ,- orZeku esa vkoaVh O;olkbZ;ksa ds ikl izLrkfor vkoaVu gsrq miyC/k djk;s tk jgs Hkw[k.Mksa dh rqyuk esa NksVs vkdkj ds Hkw[k.M vkoafVr gSA bl rF; dks ns[krs gq, fd ikoVk fLFkr xkS.ke.Mh ;kMZ dh Hkwfe dh cktkj nj Hknokfl;k fLFkr ;kMZ dh nj ls dgha vf/kd gS rFkk e.Mh esa o"kZ 1974 ls gh O;olk; gks jgk gsA uo e.Mh ;kMZ esa cMs vkdkj ds Hkw[k.M miyC/k djk;k tkuk mfpr gksxkA thjk e.Mh ds ikl Qy lCth dks vkaofVr dh tkus okyh Hkwfe dk jdck 20 ch?kk izLrkfor Fkk ijUrq 9 ch?kk Hkwfe ij ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; esa izdj.k fookfnr gksus ds dkj.k 'ks"k 11 ch?kk Hkwfe ij gh Hkw[k.Mksa dk fpUgkadu fd;k x;k gSA bu rF;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, uo e.Mh ;kMZ esa 12 xq.kk 30 ,oa 20 xq.kk 50 QqV ds Hkw[k.M l`ftr fd;s x;s gSA ch- xkS.ke.Mh ¼Q-l-½ ikoVk esa fLFkr lHkh 323 vkoaVh O;olkbZ;ksa] ftudk lR;kiu e.Mh fjdkMZ ds vk/kkj ij fd;k tk;sxk] dks Hknokfl;k esa LFkkukUrfjr fd;s tk jgs gS ;kMZ esa Hkw[k.M vkoafVr fd;s tkosaA lh- orZeku esa ikoVk fLFkr ;kMZ esa dk;Zjr O;olkbZ;ksa esa ls lCth dk Fkksd O;olk; djus okys vkoaVh O;olkbZ;ksa dks Hknokfl;k fLFkr 30 ch?kk Hkwfe esa rFkk 'ks"k QqVdj nqdkuksa esa dk;Zjr Qy dk O;olk; djus okys vkoaVh O;olkbZ;ksa dks thjk e.Mh ds ikl 11 ch?kk Hkwfe ij fpfUgr Hkw[k.M vkoafVr fd;s tkosaA ;g vkoaVu vpy lEifr vkoaVu uhfr 2005 ds rgr izFke pj.k ds vkoaVu dh nj dh x.kuk ds vuqlkj dh tk;sxhA izFke pj.k dh nj dh x.kuk ds fy, Hkwfe dh dher d`f”k mit e.Mh lfefr ¼vukt½ ds }kjk Qy lCth e.Mh dks gLrkUrfjr dh tk jgh Hkwfe ds isVs Hkqxrku dh xbZ jkf'k ,oa ml ij 18 izfr'kr izfro"kZ lk/kkj.k C;kt ds vk/kkj ij dh tk;sxhA Mh- Hkw[k.Mksa dk vkoaVu] lgefr uk cuus dh n'kk esa ykVjh ds ek/;e ls fd;k tk;sxkA bZ- vkoaVh O;olkbZ;ksa dks Hkw[k.M vkoaVu ds i'pkr 'ks"k jgs Hkw[k.Mks dk vkoaVu orZeku esa dk;Zjr O;olkbZ;ksa ¼vuqKki=/kkfj;ksa½ esa ls gh vkosnu ij vkeaf=r dj vpy lEifr vkoaVu uhfr 2005 ds f}rh; pj.k ds izko/kkuksa ds vuq:i orZeku Mh-,y-lh- ds 50 izfr'kr nj ij ykVjh ds ek/;e ls fd;k tk;sxkA ,Q- LFkkukUrj.k ds i'pkr vkoaVu fd;s tk jgs Hkw[k.Mksa dk vkoaVu 99 o"khZ; yht vk/kkj ij fd;k tk;sxkA xkS.ke.Mh ;kMZ Qy lCth ikoVk esa ,sls vkoaVh O;olkbZ ftUgksaus viuh nqdku dh yht esa ifjofrZr djk fy;k gS mudks yht ifjorZu esa tek djkbZ ewy jkf'k dk lek;kstu Hkw[k.M dh dher esa fd;k tk;sxkA yht jkf'k@fdjk;s ds isVs tek djkbZ jkf'k dk dksbZ lek;kstu ugha fd;k tkosxkA th- ;g izdj.k izkstsDV fo'ks"k dh fØ;kfUofr gsrq e.Mh lfefr dks LFkkukUrfjr fd;s tkus ds lacaf/kr gS ,oa uohu vkoaVu ls lacaf/kr ugha gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vkoaVh O;olkbZ;ks dks vkoaVu ds i'pkr 'ks"k Hkw[k.Mksa ds fy, gh d`”kd dksVs dk vkj{k.k fd;k tk;sxkA lEiw.kZ Hkw[k.Mksa ds vk/kkj ij ughaA^^ 7-02-2013 ^^4- vkt cSBd esa izdj.k ds leLr igyqvksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA ;g izdj.k tks/kiqj esa jktLFkku jkT; iFk ifjogu fuxe ds orZeku cl LVS.M ds foLrkj ,oa fodkl fd;s tkus dh ,d vge ;kstuk ls lacaf/kr gS vkSj cl LVS.M dk foLrkj rHkh laHko gS tcfd orZeku esa Qy lCth eaMh ikoVk ds lHkh vkoaVh vuqKki=/kkfj;ksa dks Hknokfl;k esa bl gsrq miyC/k Hkwfe ij izLrkfor nqdkuksa dk vkoaVu fd;k tk;sA lkekU; uhfr ds rgr lHkh vkoaVh vuqKki=/kkfj;ksa dks f'kV fd;k tkuk laHko ugha gksxkA fopkj foe'kZ ds ckn fuEu fu.kZ; fy;s x;s%& 1- xkS.ke.Mh ¼Q-l-½ ikoVk esa fLFkr lHkh 323 vkoaVh O;olkbZ;ksa] ftudk lR;kiu e.Mh fjdkMZ ds vk/kkj ij fd;k tk;sxk] dks Hknokfl;k esa LFkkukUrfjr fd;s tk jgs ;kMZ esa Hkw[k.M vkoafVr fd;s tkosaA 2- orZeku esa ikoVk fLFkr ;kMZ esa dk;Zjr O;olkbZ;ksa esa ls lCth dk Fkksd O;olk; djus okys vkoaVh O;olkbZ;ksa dks Hknokfl;k fLFkr 30 ch?kk Hkwfe esa rFkk 'ks"k QqVdj nqdkuksa esa dk;Zjr Qy dk O;olk; djus okys vkaoVh O;olkbZ;ksa dks thjk e.Mh ds ikl 11 ch?kk Hkwfe ij fpfUgr Hkw[k.M vkoafVr fd;s tkosaA ;g vkoaVu vpy lEifr vkoaVu uhfr 2005 ds rgr izFke pj.k ds vkoaVu dh nj dh x.kuk ds vuqlkj dh tk;sxhA 3- Hkw[k.Mksa dk vkoaVu vkilh lgefr ds vk/kkj ij fd;k tk;sA lgefr uk cuus dh n'kk esa ykVjh ds ek/;e ls fd;k tk;sxkA bl gsrq eaMh lfefr 20-02-2013 rd fLFkfr Li"V djsA 4- vkoaVh vuqKki=/kkfj;ksa ds vykok eaMh {ks= esa dk;Zjr vU; O;olkbZ;ksa dks Hkh muds O;olk; dh izd`fr ds vuq:i lCth ,oa Qy Cykd esa izFke pj.k ds izko/kkuksa ds vuq:i vkoaVu fd;k tk;sA budk vkoaVu vkoaVh vuqKki=/kkfj;ksa ds i'pkr 'ks"k jgs Hkw[k.Mksa ds fy;s fd;k tk;sA 5- izLrkfor lCth Cykd esa nqdkuksa ds vkdkj esa leqfpr ifjorZu djrs gq, vfrfjDr nqdkus Hkh l`ftr dh tk;s ftlls dh lCth dk O;olk; dj jgs vuqKki=/kkjh xSj vkoafV;ksa dks Hkh lCth Cykd esa Hkw[k.Mksa dk vkoaVu fd;k tk ldsA 6- Qy lCth eaMh ikoVk ds izkxa.k esa orZeku esa dk;Zjr QqVdj O;olkbZ;ksa dks Hknokfl;k esa fLFkr jksMost odZ'kki dh izkIr gksus okyh Hkwfe esa NksVs Hkw[k.M dkVdj lek;ksftr@vkoaVu fd;k tk;sA orZeku esa QqVdj O;olkbZ;ksa ds fy;s vkoaVu ds laca/k esa i`Fkd ls dksbZ uhfr ugha gksus ds dkj.k iz'kklfud foHkkx vius Lrj ij uhfr fu/kkZfjr dj vkoaVu izfØ;k iw.kZ djsA 7- tks/kiqj fodkl izkf/kdj.k ds }kjk d`f"k mit eaMh lfefr ¼vukt½ tks/kiqj dks xzke vkx.kok esa vkoafVr dh x;h 90 ch?kk Hkwfe dh ,ot esa d`f”k mit eaMh lfefr ¼Qy lCth½ rFkk ¼vukt½ tks/kiqj dks fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ Hkqxrku ugha fn;k tkuk gksxkA 8- Qy lCth eaMh dh leLr 17 ch?kk 5 fcLok Hkwfe jksMost ds foLrkj ,oa fodkl ds fy;s nh tk;sxhA 9- uo fodflr fd;s tk jgs clLVS.M esa fdlh izdkj dh O;olkf;d xfrfof/k] dsoy ;kf=;ksa ds fy;s miyC/k djk;s tkus okyh lqfo/kkvksa ds vykok fodflr ugha dh tk;sxhA 10- orZeku Qy lCth eaMh izkax.k ikoVk ds izos'k ,oa fudkl }kj dks pkSMk djus esa vkus okyh nqdkuksa dks jktLFkku jkT; iFk ifjogu fuxe }kjk fodflr fd;s tk jgs clLVS.M dh O;olkf;d nqdkuksa esa lek;ksftr d;k tkosxkA 11- jktLFkku jkT; iFk ifjogu fuxe dks u;s LFkku ij odZ'kki fodflr djus ds fy;s foRr foHkkx C;kt eqDr _.k miyC/k djk;sxk ftldh olwyh 7 o"kZ ckn izkjEHk gksxhA 12- mDr uo clLVS.M dk f'kykU;kl dk;ZØe vizSy ds izFke lIrkg esa fd;k tkuk izLrkfor gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa mijksDr fu.kZ;ksa dh ikyuk esa le;c) rjhds ls lqfuf'pr fd;k tk;s rFkk vkoaVu vkfn dh izfØ;k Hkh rn~uq:i iw.kZ dj yh tkosA^^ 6. The petitioner's case is that he, having a license to carry on the business/trade of selling fruits as a semi- wholesaler, has been allotted a plot ad-measuring 12' x 30', in the new Mandi at Bhadwasia; whereas the respondents nos. 5 to 10, who too, are semi-wholesalers, have been allotted much bigger plots admeasuring 18' x 50'. Initially, seven petitioners led by M/s. Nanak Ram Narayan Ram felt aggrieved of the decision of the respondents no. 3, as he had allotted bigger shops (ad-measuring 18' x 50') to respondents nos. 3 to 9, mentioned in the list of allottees published by the respondent no. 3 and filed a joint petition, thereafter, petitioners nos. 1 to 3 and 5 to 7 withdrawn their petitions. Now the writ petition is only on behalf of M/s. A Altaf Shah & Brothers (earlier it was M/s. Manakram Narayan Das). 7. The petitioner's contention is that as per the Shifting Policy of 2013, the decisive factor is "license" and not the "kind/nature of business"; hence all the semi-wholesalers should have been allotted equal plots, irrespective of the fact, whether they were dealing in fruits or vegetables. The petitioner has been hostilely discriminated vis-à-vis respondents nos. 5 to 10, who have been allotted shops ad-measuring 18' x 50' feet, simply because they are semi-wholesalers/wholesalers of vegetables. 8. The learned counsel for the petitioner invited attention of this Court towards the averments made in para no. 11 of the writ petition to substantiate his arguments. For the purpose of ready reference the para no. 11 of the writ petition, which encompasses the soul of the controversy is being reproduced hereunder: "11. That recently the petitioner has come to know that the 6 semi wholesalers were included in the list of wholesalers and they are being granted the shops in Bhadwasia Mandi Yard. The similarly situated persons (semi-wholesalers) are being found eligible for allotment of shops as wholesalers at Bhadwasia Yard and respondents have taken decision to allot the shops admeasuring 18 x 50 feet at Bhadwasia Yard. The petitioner though was also entitled to get the shop of 18 x 50 feet at Bhadwasia but he has not considered for the said allotment. To the best of the petitioner's knowledge the names of such persons who are being found eligible for the allotment of 18 x 50 Feet shop are Sunil Brothers, Murlidhar, Bhagwandas, Ramesh Bhai, Madanlal. The petitioner though was also entitled to get the shop of 18 x 50 feet at Bhadwasia but he has not considered for the said allotment. To the best of the petitioner's knowledge the names of such persons who are being found eligible for the allotment of 18 x 50 Feet shop are Sunil Brothers, Murlidhar, Bhagwandas, Ramesh Bhai, Madanlal. The name of their firms to the best of petitioner's knowledge are at Sr. No. 56, 146 & 147 in the list of semi-wholesalers. The above referred persons are similarly situated as like petitioner and same is fortified by the list as published by the respondents for semi-wholesalers. Petitioner has visited the office of respondent No. 3 and have asked about the information and the reasons for non-inclusion then it was told by the office that the record and reasons cannot be made available to him as some matter is pending under consideration before this Hon'ble Court." 9. A reply to the writ petition has been filed by the respondents contending inter alia, that respondents nos. 5 to 10 have been allotted plots as per their eligibility & entitlement and that no different treatment has been given to the petitioner. Corresponding reply to para no. 11 of the writ petition reads thus: "11. That the contents of para no. 11 of the writ petition has not been admitted in the manner the same have been averred, however, it is submitted that the six semi wholesalers are allowed to make application for allotment of the shop admeasuring 18 x 50 ft. at Bhadwasia yard on the ground that all these 6 semi wholesalers are doing the business of vegetables and they are depositing the Mandi charges/user charges for the business of vegetables only. That all these six semi wholesalers are doing the business of vegetable and are also paying charges for the same therefore, they are allowed to make application for allotment of the shops for the block of wholesale Sabji market. That the petitioners though are semi wholesalers but they are doing the business of fruits and they are also paying the charges for fruits only. That even the applications submitted by the petitioners for allotment of the shops is for the fruits only and therefore, they are liable to be allotted shops in the block of wholesale fruit market. That the petitioners though are semi wholesalers but they are doing the business of fruits and they are also paying the charges for fruits only. That even the applications submitted by the petitioners for allotment of the shops is for the fruits only and therefore, they are liable to be allotted shops in the block of wholesale fruit market. Copy of the chart showing the charges deposited by six semi wholesalers as well as one of the application submitted by one of the petitioners is annexed herewith and marked as Annexure R3/2 & R3/3 respectively." 10. During the course of arguments, it has been asserted by the learned Addl. Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondent-State that in the process of shifting of the present Paota Mandi to Bhadwasia Mandi, the respondents have developed two separate Mandis viz., "Vegetable Mandi" and "Fruit Mandi". As far as Fruit Mandi is concerned, as per the Policy, the wholesalers are to be allotted shops ad-measuring 12' x 30', whereas looking to the nature of the business, the wholesalers of Vegetable are required to be allotted shops ad-measuring 18' x 50'. 11. Learned Addl. Advocate General contended that the petitioner being a wholesaler in Fruit, belongs to a separate class than the respondents nos. 6 to 11 and other businessmen dealing in vegetables. No wholesaler of fruits has been allotted bigger shops (18' x 50). 12. Mr. Manoj Bhandari, learned counsel appearing for the private respondents Nos. 7 to 12 argued that the petitioner has created unnecessary confusion; there is no category called 'semi-wholesaler', there are only two types of licenses, (i) wholesaler and (ii) retailer. He argued that it may be true that the size of shop which the petitioner is having is equal to the size of shops occupied by the respondents, in Paota Mandi, but the basic difference between them is that the petitioner is a wholesale dealer/licensee in Fruits, whereas the private respondents are wholesale - licensees of vegetables. He argued that the respondents have developed two separate Mandis, wherein plots have been earmarked for wholesalers of each trade. He argued that the respondents have developed two separate Mandis, wherein plots have been earmarked for wholesalers of each trade. If on account of availability of land, business requirement or for other reasons, if the respondents have created bigger plot size in vegetable Mandi, which have been allotted to his clients, the petitioner should not have grudge, inasmuch as all the licensees of fruits have been allotted smaller plots (12' x 30') while all licensees dealing in vegetables have been allotted bigger plots (18' x 50'). 13. Heard learned counsel and perused the relevant material. 14. It is not the case of the petitioner that any of the respondents and other traders being semi wholesalers in Fruits, have been allotted bigger shop. 15. In considered opinion of this Court, the licensees dealing in fruits and licensees dealing in vegetables form two different classes. If the respondents, after considering the nature of business and other relevant factors have developed two separate Mandis and have taken a Policy decision, which has been uniformly applied to all dealers alike, while keeping in mind their nature of business, it cannot be said that there is a differential treatment much less hostile discrimination meted out to the petitioner, as against the dealers dealing in vegetables. 16. Creation of two classes of dealers, given the fact that two entirely separate Mandis have been developed is a reasonable classification, based on intelligible criterion. Such classification is essential and inevitable, when two separate markets have been developed. 17. As a matter of fact, presently licensees of vegetables and fruits are/have been operating in the Paota Mandi. Later on, the respondents have decided to establish two separate Mandis at Bhadwasia; (i) Bhadwasia Fruit Mandi and (ii) Bhadwasia Vegetable Mandi. The decision of the State Government taken in its meeting dated 7.2.2013 (reproduced hereinabove, particularly paras nos. 2 and 4 thereof) leaves no room for ambiguity that it was decided by all concerned that the traders engaged in a particular nature of business viz., vegetables and fruits will be allotted plots/shops as per their business. 18. The petitioner's argument has been that as per Transfer Policy, 2013, particularly clauses (7) and (8), the basis of allotment of shop was the existing shop in Paota Mandi and the same cannot be changed to nature of business. 18. The petitioner's argument has been that as per Transfer Policy, 2013, particularly clauses (7) and (8), the basis of allotment of shop was the existing shop in Paota Mandi and the same cannot be changed to nature of business. With a view to dwell upon petitioner's contention, it would be apt to reproduce clauses (7) and (8) of the Transfer Policy of 2013, which are as under: ^^¼7½ ^^e.Mh izkax.k ds LFkkukUrj.k** ls rkRi;Z orZeku@fo|eku e.Mh izkax.k esa vofLFkr vkoaVh vuqKki=/kkjh O;olkbZ;ksa dks] ftUgsa fo|eku e.Mh izkax.k esa v?kksf"kr fd;s tkus vFkok vU; dkj.kksa ls izLrkfor uohu e.Mh izkax.k esa Hkw[k.M@nqdku vkoaVu ds ek/;e ls LFkkukUrfjr fd;k tkuk gSA ¼8½ ^^fo|eku vkoaVh vuqKki=/kkjh** ls rkRi;Z orZeku e.Mh izkax.k esa vkoafVr O;olk; LFky ij vuqKki=/kkjh O;olkbZ;ksa ls gSA^^ 19. In considered opinion of this Court, clauses (7) and (8) of the Transfer Policy of 2013 deals with the right of licensees carrying on their business in existing Mandi at Paota. According to the Policy of 2013, the petitioner as well as the respondents nos. 7 to 12 have a right of allotment of plot/shop at new Mandi at Bhadwasia; however, as far as size of the plot is concerned, the Policy of 2013 neither throws any light nor does it have any provision governing size of the plot. 20. Hence, if the respondents have decided to develop two separate Mandis and have chosen to allot shops based upon their nature of business for the ease and convenience of the business, no fault can be found in such decision. 21. Clauses (7) and (8) of the Policy, if interpreted purposively, in the backdrop of above facts, their stand turns out to be perfectly just and proper. If they have developed plots ad-measuring 12' x 30' for wholesalers of fruits, as against plots of 18' x 50' for wholesalers of vegetables and allotted the same consider their business, then, regardless of the fact that their existing shops at Paota are equal in size, they can be allotted different size of plots in new Mandi at Bhadwasia, particularly when, two separate Mandis have been developed for vegetable and fruits. 22. This being the position, this Court finds no substance in the petitioner's petition, hence, the same is dismissed. 23. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.