JUDGMENT : PANKAJ NAQVI, J. 1. Counter affidavit on behalf of the informant is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Raghuvansh Misra learned counsel for applicant, Shri Anant Ram Gupta, for the informant and Dr.S.B.Maurya, learned A.G.A, and perused the record. 3. Applicant Rajendra Singh seeks bail in Case Crime no.01 of 2019, under Sections 498A, 304B IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Basai Mohammadpur, District- Firozabad. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is the father-in-law of the victim, the victim was undergoing medical treatment as she was mentally unsound, she committed suicide for reasons not attributable to the applicant who has no previous criminal history, applicant is in jail since 14.5.2019, undertakes not to misuse the liberty, he be released on bail. 5. Learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. 7. Let the applicant involved in aforesaid case be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. However, it is clarified that accused/husband Shailendra would not be entitled to claim parity with this order.