JUDGMENT Pushpendra Singh Bhati, J. - Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record. 2. The petitioner has been arrested in connection FIR No.401/2019 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Hanumangarh for the offences punishable under Sections 354, 504 of IPC and Section 67 of I.T. Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 27.11.2019, and that, the persistent calling and messaging is not a heinous crime and the age of the petitioner is 21 years. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, as also the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 27.11.2019 and age of the petitioner is 21 years, this Court deems it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C. 6. Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Vijender Meena @ Vijay Meena S/o Shri Satyanarayan, shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 401/2019 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, Hanumangarh, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, out of which one shall be the petitioner's uncle namely Ratiram S/o Banwarilal, R/o Kotputli, Jaipur, to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.