Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2019 DIGILAW 3160 (PNJ)

Kavita Yadav And Ors v. Vivek And Others

2019-11-25

RITU BAHRI

body2019
JUDGMENT Ritu Bahri, J. - The present appeal has been preferred by the claimants-appellants, seeking enhancement of the amount of compensation awarded by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fast Track Court-II, Gurgaon, (for short, 'the Tribunal') to the tune of Rs.21,00,000/- vide impugned award dated 30.01.2008. 2. As per claimants, on 02.12.2004, the deceased Harpal Singh Yadav was going on his motorcycle bearing No. HR-26-R-5021 and when he reached near BPL road Samalkha Electric Pole 9 and 10 KVC, in the meantime, the offending Maruti Alto car bearing No. HR-26-W-6033, which was being driven by respondent No. 1 hit the motorcycle of the deceased. Due to the accident, he fell down on the road and sustained grievous and multiple injuries. The accident in question was witnessed by Head Constables Jai Parkash and Madan Lal. F.I.R No. 96 dated 02.12.2004 under Sections 279/304-A IPC was registered. 3. While assessing compensation, the Tribunal took the income of the deceased at Rs.14510/- per month and cut of 1/3rd was imposed. The Tribunal applied the multiplier of 18. Rs.26,400/- were granted under convention heads. The total compensation awarded to the claimants was Rs.21,00,000/-. 4. The learned counsel for the claimants-appellants contends that the compensation awarded by the learned Tribunal is on the lower side and deserves to the enhanced, as no future prospects have been awarded. 5. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent-Insurance Co. has vehemently opposed the present appeal. 6. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 7. It is not in dispute between the parties that the accident had taken place, as the accident had been duly proved by the claimants/appellants. 8. Further the children and father are also entitled for compensation of Rs.40,000/- each under the head of loss of consortium, in view of judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in a case of Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram,2018 4 RCR(Civil) 837 . 9. Reference at this stage can be made to a recent judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in a case of National Insurance Company Ltd vs. Pranay Sethi and others, passed in Spl Leave Petition (Civil) No. 25590 of 2014, decided on October 31, 2017 wherein the issue with regard to awarding of amount under the conventional heads has been authoritatively decided, while observing as under :- "54. As far as the conventional heads are concerned, we find it difficult to agree with the view expressed in Rajesh. It has granted Rs. 25,000/- towards funeral expenses, Rs. 1,00,000/-loss of consortium and Rs. 1,00,000/- towards loss of care and guidance for minor children. The head relating to loss of care and minor children does not exist. Though Rajesh refers to Santosh Devi, it does not seem to follow the same. The conventional and traditional heads, needless to say, cannot be determined on percentage basis because that would not be an acceptable criterion. Unlike determination of income, the said heads have to be quantified. Any quantification must have a reasonable foundation. There can be no dispute over the fact that price index, fall in bank interest, escalation of rates in many a field have to be noticed. The court cannot remain oblivious to the same. There has been a thumb rule in this aspect. Otherwise, there will be extreme difficulty in determination of the same and unless the thumb rule is applied, there will be immense variation lacking any kind of consistency as a consequence of which, the orders passed by the tribunals and courts are likely to be unguided. Therefore, we think it seemly to fix reasonable sums. It seems to us that reasonable figures on conventional heads, namely, loss of estate, loss of consortium and funeral expenses should be Rs. 15,000/-, Rs. 40,000/- and Rs. 15,000/- respectively. The principle of revisiting the said heads is an acceptable principle. But the revisit should not be fact-centric or quantum-centric. We think that it would be condign that the amount that we have quantified should be enhanced on percentage basis in every three years and the enhancement should be at the rate of 10% in a span of three years. We are disposed to hold so because that will bring in consistency in respect of those heads.". 10. In the present case, the compensation is being reassessed as per judgments mentioned above. S. No. Heads Calculations (i) Income Rs. 14510/- per month (ii) 40% of (i) above to be added as future prospects Rs. 14510 + Rs. 5804 = Rs. 20314/- per month (iii) 1/4th of (ii) deducted as personal expenses of the deceased Rs. 20314 - Rs. 5078 = Rs. 15236/- per month (iv) Compensation after multiplier of 17 is applied Rs. 15236 x 12 x 17 = Rs. 14510 + Rs. 5804 = Rs. 20314/- per month (iii) 1/4th of (ii) deducted as personal expenses of the deceased Rs. 20314 - Rs. 5078 = Rs. 15236/- per month (iv) Compensation after multiplier of 17 is applied Rs. 15236 x 12 x 17 = Rs. 31,08,144/- (v) Conventional heads (Loss of estate, consortium and funeral expenses) Rs. 70,000/- (vi) Loss of fillail consortium (father of the deceased) Rs. 40,000/- (vii) Loss of consortium (children) Rs. 80,000/- (Rs. 40,000/- each) Total Compensation awarded Rs. 32,98,144/- Enhanced amount of compensation 32,98,144 - 21,00,000 = Rs. 11,98,144/- (rounded off to Rs. 11,98,000/-) 11. The enhanced amount of compensation of Rs.11,98,000/- shall be payable within a period of forty five days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. The appellants shall also get interest @ 9% per annum in view of judgment of Hon'ble the Apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 4528-2019 titled as Dara Singh @ Dhara Banjara vs. Shyam Singh Varma and ors, decided on 01.05.2019. The remaining conditions of disbursal of amount and recovery rights shall remain unaltered. 12. Accordingly, the award stands modified to the above extent and the present appeal is partly allowed.