ORDER 1. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 16.01.2014 passed by the High Court of Allahabad in Special Appeal No. 67 of 2014, whereby the High Court allowed the special appeal filed by the respondents-herein and set aside the order dated 11.12.2013, passed by the learned single judge in favour of the appellant, in the writ petition therein. 3. The factual matrix necessary for adjudication of issues involved and the disposal of this case, is as follows. The appellant was a constable in the Railway Protection Force. A charge sheet dated 01st September 2001 was issued to the appellant under Rule 153 of the Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987. The charges of misconduct as contained in the charge sheet was that on 6th January 2001, appellant was assigned duty in the shift from 00.00 hours to 08.00 hours at Jhansi Loco Post but he remained absent in an unauthorized manner, from the duty, till the issuance of the charge sheet. The inquiry officer held that the charge of misconduct was duly proved. 4. Thereafter, a copy of enquiry report was served on the appellant, to which he submitted a representation. Subsequently, the explanations were submitted by the appellant for the charges leveled against him, and the same was found to be unsatisfactory by the disciplinary authority. Therefore, appellant was removed from service by the respondents-authorities by an order dated 28th November 2001. Thereafter, appellant's appeal and revision application was also rejected by the respondents-authorities vide order dated 07th May 2002 and 31st December 2002, respectively. 5. Appellant challenged the said removal order before the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 41761 of 2003. Therein, the learned Single Judge of the High Court, vide order dated 11.12.2013, quashed the order dated 28th November 2001, 7th May 2002 and 31st December 2002, passed by the respondent-authorities and directed them to consider the claims of the appellant afresh and pass a reasoned order, after giving opportunity of hearing to the appellant. 6. Aggrieved by the said order, respondents approached the High Court in Special Appeal No. 67 of 2014. Therein, the High Court vide impugned order, allowed the special appeal filed by the respondents-authorities and set aside the order dated 11.12.2013, passed by the learned single judge in favour of the appellant-herein. 7. 6. Aggrieved by the said order, respondents approached the High Court in Special Appeal No. 67 of 2014. Therein, the High Court vide impugned order, allowed the special appeal filed by the respondents-authorities and set aside the order dated 11.12.2013, passed by the learned single judge in favour of the appellant-herein. 7. Being dissatisfied by the impugned order, appellant approached this Hon'ble Court through this petition. 8. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the evidence available on record. 9. Taking into consideration the fact that the appellant was suffering from some psychiatric problems, admitted in the Mental Hospital, Ranchi and took treatment there-from, we direct respondent no. 2 to consider granting 'Compassionate Allowance' as provided under Rule 65 of the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 and determine the amount of Compassionate Allowance expeditiously. 10. After determination of the Compassionate Allowance, with effect from the date of appellant's removal from the service, the same shall be disbursed immediately, to the appellant. 11. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of in the afore-stated terms and without any cost.