JUDGMENT : Ajay Mohan Goel, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. During the course of argument, Dr. Sharma learned counsel for the review petitioner could not point out any error apparent in the judgment, on the face of the record, review of which is being sought. His contention is that at the time when the writ petition was argued before this Court, learned counsel then representing the petitioner could not bring to the notice of this Court certain relevant facts, and on this ground there is a need to review the judgment. In my considered view, this is no ground to seek review of a judgment. The contention of Dr. Sharma that when the writ was heard, certain points could not be brought into the notice of the Court, does not satisfies the condition of there being an error apparent on the face of the record. 2. In this view of the matter, in my considered view, there is no ground to review the judgment passed by this Court and this petition is accordingly dismissed. Copy dasti.