JUDGMENT Shree Chandrashekhar, J. - Mr. Shekhar Sinha, the learned A.P.P tenders a copy of the report on criminal antecedent of the petitioners. 2. Taken on record. 3. It is stated that there are as many as 11 criminal cases lodged against the petitioner no. 1. 4. The petitioners are aggrieved of the order dated 12.12.2018 by which warrant of arrest has been issued and the order dated 15.01.2019 by which processes under section 82 Cr.P.C have been issued against them. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order dated 15.01.2019 by which process under section 82 Cr.P.C has been issued does not disclose proper application of mind by the Magistrate. 6. No doubt, the exercise of powers under section 82 Cr.P.C entails serious consequences to an accused; once process under section 82 Cr.P.C is issued in view of the judgment in Lavesh Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)" reported in , (2012) 8 SCC 730 an accused is disentitled to seek anticipatory bail. The exercise of powers under section 82 Cr.P.C therefore must be founded on subjective satisfaction of the Magistrate which the Magistrate arrives at on the basis of the materials produced before him. But then, in a criminal case conduct of an accused is also a relevant factor. The prosecution story as narrated in the written report dated 03.11.2018 would disclose the manner of assault by the petitioners on the Central Industrial Security Force. 7. In view of the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to interfere in this matter and accordingly, Cr.M.P No. 270 of 2019 is dismissed. However, if the petitioners surrender before the court below within four weeks and make a prayer for bail, a copy of the bail application duly served upon the learned A.P.P atleast three days prior to the date of hearing, their bail applications shall preferably be considered on the same day.