ORDER 1. On being mentioned, taken on board. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has drawn the attention of the Court to a typographical error in the reproduction of Rule 68 of the Rajasthan Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1959 on page 4 of the judgment dated 24 January 2019. 3. Sub-Rule (2-A) should stand corrected to read as clause (f) of sub-rule (2). 4. Consequent upon the aforesaid correction, in the paragraph immediately following the reproduction of Rule 68, the expression "sub-rule (2-A)", wherever it appears, shall stand corrected to read as "clause (f) of sub-rule (2)". 5. The judgment dated 24 January 2019 shall stand corrected accordingly.