JUDGMENT 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings arising out of FIR No. 239/2013 registered at Police Station Nahargarh, Jaipur (North) for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 341 and 452 IPC. 2. Petitioners Ratan Meena and Jatan Meena @ Rohit Meena and complainants Gopal Singh Meena and Manish Meena are present in person. They have stated that after the charge-sheet was filed, the trial is in progress. They have drawn attention of this Court to the order dated 4.2.2019 passed by the trial court, whereby the compromise was accepted qua offences under Sections 323 and 341 IPC as the said offences are compoundable but rejected the same qua offences under Sections 143 and 452 IPC. They have drawn attention of this Court to the order dated 4.2.2019 passed by the trial court, whereby the compromise was accepted qua offences under Sections 323 and 341 IPC as the said offences are compoundable but rejected the same qua offences under Sections 143 and 452 IPC. The order dated 4.2.2019 passed by the trial court reads as under:- ^^fnukad% 04-02-2019 fo}ku lgk;d vfHk;kstu vf/kdkjh mifLFkrA vfHk;qDrx.k jru eh.kk o tru eh.kk mQZ jksfgr eh.kk e; vf/koDrk mifLFkrA ifjoknh xksiky flag eh.kk o et:c euh"k dqekj eh.kk e; vf/koDrk mifLFkrA gkftj i{kdkjku }kjk tfj;s vf/koDrk ÁkFkZuk i= ckcr~ i=koyh ryc fd;s tkus dk is'k fd;k x;k] ftl ij i=koyh lhxs ls ryc dh xbZA vf/koDrk mHk; i{kdkjku us tkfgj fd;k fd i{kdkjku ds e/; jkthukek gks x;k gS vkSj os bl Ádj.k esa vc dksbZ dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrs gSaA gkftj ifjoknh xksiky flag eh.kk o et:c euh"k dqekj eh.kk o gkftj vfHk;qDrx.k jru eh.kk o tru eh.kk mQZ jksfgr eh.kk us tfj;s vf/koDrkx.k ÁkFkZuk i= ckcr~ 323] 341 vkbZŒihŒlhŒ esa jkthukek rLnhd fd;s tkus dk is'k fd;k x;k] ftldh bckjr i{kdkjku~ dks i<+dj] lqukbZ o le>kbZ xbZ rks i{kdkjku us lqu o le>dj jkthukes dh bckjr dks lgh gksuk o fcuk fdlh ncko ds gksuk Lohdkj fd;kA i{kdkjku dh igpku muds vf/koDrkx.k }kjk dh xbZA ckn xkSj i=koyh /kkjk 323] 341 HkkŒnaŒlaŒ dkfcys jkthukek gksus ds dkj.k jkthukek ckn lek/kku U;k;ky; rLnhd fd;k x;kA jkthukek 'kkfey i=koyh jgsA pwafd vfHk;qDrx.k jru eh.kk o tru eh.kk mQZ jksfgr eh.kk dk ifjoknh xksiky flag eh.kk o et:c euh"k dqekj eh.kk ds lkFk vkjksfir vijk/k /kkjk 323] 341 HkkŒnaŒlaŒ ds vijk/k esa jkthukek gksdj fof/k vuqlkj rLnhd fd;k tk pqdk gSA vr% vfHk;qDrx.k & ¼1½ vfHk;qDr jru eh.kk iq= ?ku';ke eh.kk] fuoklh edku uEcj 4319] xksfoUn jko th dk jkLrk] t;iqj ,oa ¼2½ vfHk;qDr tru eh.kk mQZ jksfgr eh.kk iq= ?ku';ke eh.kk] fuoklh edku uEcj 4319] xksfoUn jko th dk jkLrk] t;iqj dks vkjksfir vijk/k /kkjk 323] 341 HkkŒnaŒlaŒ ds vkjksi ls c:;s jkthukek nks"keqDr ?kksf"kr fd;k tkrk gSA Ádj.k esa vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) /kkjk 143] 452 Hkkjrh; n.M lafgrk esa fopkj.k 'ks"k jgrk gSA i=koyh fu;r is'kh fnukad 20-02-2019 dks okLrs lk{; vfHk;kstu gsrq is'k gksA** 3. Yesterday also, parties were present in the court and this Court had passed the following order:- "Let at first instance, statement of parties be recorded by Registrar (Judicial) of this Court after they are duly identified. List this case tomorrow, i.e. on 12.2.2019." 4. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, statement of complainants Gopal Singh Meena and Manish Meena have been recorded by the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. List this case tomorrow, i.e. on 12.2.2019." 4. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, statement of complainants Gopal Singh Meena and Manish Meena have been recorded by the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. The said statements are taken on record and for ready reference the same are reproduced below:- ^^jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ihB] t;iqj ,lŒchŒ fØfeuy felŒ ihfV'ku uEcj 1006@2019 jru ehuk o vU; cuke jktLFkku ljdkj o vU; fnukad 11-02-2019 eSa xksiky flag ehuk iq= LoŒ Jh y{e.kjke ehuk] tkfr ehuk] vk;q 59 o"kZ] fuoklh & edku uEcj 4335] xksfoUn jko th jkLrk] vk[kjh pkSjkgk] iqjkuh cLrh t;iqj ftyk & t;iqjA 'kiFkiwoZd c;ku djrk gaw fd jru ehuk vkSj tru ehuk gekjs iMkslh ,oa fj'rsnkjh esa gSA esjs iq= euh"k ehuk ls jru ehuk vkSj tru ehuk dh fdlh ckr ij dgklquh gks x;h >xMk gks x;k FkkA ftl dkj.k esjs }kjk jru ehuk ,oa mlds HkkbZ tru ehuk ,oa vU; yksxks ds f[kykQ ukgjx< Fkkus esa ,d eqdnek uEcj 239@2013 ntZ djk;k x;k FkkA mDr eqdnesa esa gekjh vkilh lgefr ls jkthukek gks pqdk gS vkSj eSa vc jru ehuk ,oa mlds HkkbZ tru ehuk ,oa vU; yksxks ds f[kykQ mDr eqdnesa esa dksbZ dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrk gawA eq>s vkSj dqN ugha dguk gSA uksV & xokg dk c;ku esjs funsZ'ku esa mlds dgs vuqlkj Vad.kdrkZ }kjk dEI;qVj ij Vafdr fd;k x;k] ftls xokg dks i<+dj lquk;k o le>k;k x;k rks mlus mDr dFkuksa dks lqu o le> dj lgh gksuk Lohdkj fd;kA jftLVkj U;kf;dA** ^^jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ihB] t;iqj ,lŒchŒ fØfeuy felŒ ihfV'ku uEcj 1006@2019 jru ehuk o vU; cuke jktLFkku ljdkj o vU; fnukad 11-02-2019 eSa euh"k dqekj ehuk iq= Jh xksikyflag ehuk] tkfr ehuk] vk;q 28 o"kZ] fuoklh & edku uEcj 4335] xksfoUn jko th jkLrk] vk[kjh pkSjkgk] iqjkuh cLrh t;iqj ftyk & t;iqjA 'kiFkiwoZd c;ku djrk gaw fd jru ehuk vkSj tru ehuk gekjs iMkslh ,oa fj'rsnkjh esa gSA esjs lkFk jru ehuk vkSj tru ehuk us fdlh ckr dks ysdj dgklquh dh vkSj >xMk fd;k FkkA ftl dkj.k esjs firk xksikyflag ehuk us jru ehuk ,oa mlds HkkbZ tru ehuk ,oa vU; yksxks ds f[kykQ ukgjx< Fkkus esa ,d eqdnek uEcj 239@2013 ntZ djk;k x;k FkkA mDr eqdnesa esa gekjh vkilh lgefr ls jkthukek gks pqdk gSA eSa vkSj esjs firkth xksikyflag ehuk vc jru ehuk ,oa mlds HkkbZ tru ehuk ,oa vU; yksxks ds f[kykQ mDr eqdnesa esa dksbZ dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrs gSA eq>s vkSj dqN ugha dguk gSA uksV & xokg dk c;ku esjs funsZ'ku esa mlds dgs vuqlkj Vad.kdrkZ }kjk dEI;wVj ij Vafdr fd;k x;k] ftls xokg dks i<+dj lquk;k o le>k;k x;k rks mlus mDr dFkuksa dks lqu o le> dj lgh gksuk Lohdkj fd;kA jftLVkj U;kf;dA** 5. Similarly, statement of petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 Ratan Meena and Jatan Meena @ Rohit Meena respectively were also recorded by Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. The statements are also taken on record. It will be apposite here to reproduce the statement of petitioner Nos. Similarly, statement of petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 Ratan Meena and Jatan Meena @ Rohit Meena respectively were also recorded by Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. The statements are also taken on record. It will be apposite here to reproduce the statement of petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 recorded by Registrar (Judicial) of this Court as under:- ^^jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ihB] t;iqj ,lŒchŒ fØfeuy felŒ ihfV'ku uEcj 1006@2019 jru ehuk o vU; cuke jktLFkku ljdkj o vU; fnukad 11-02-2019 eSa jru dqekj ehuk iq= LoŒ Jh ?ku';ke ehuk] tkfr ehuk] vk;q 28 o"kZ] fuoklh & edku uEcj 4319] xksfoUn jko th jkLrk] vk[kjh pkSjkgk] iqjkuh cLrh t;iqj ftyk & t;iqjA 'kiFkiwoZd c;ku djrk gaw fd xksiky flag ehuk ,oa euh"k ehuk esjs fj'rsnkj gSA lu 2013 esa gekjh ikfjokfjd elys ij dgklquh gks x;h vkSj >xMk gks x;k FkkA ftl dkj.k xksiky flag ehuk us esjs ,oa HkkbZ tru mQZ jksfgr ,oa vU; yksxks ds f[kykQ ukgjx< Fkkus esa ,d eqdnek ntZ djk;k FkkA gekjs }kjk Hkh xksikyflag ehuk ds f[kykQ ukgjx< Fkkus esa ,d eqdnek ntZ djk;k FkkA ftlesa ,Qvkj is'k gks pqdh gSA ftldks ge ÁksVsLV dj jgs FksA gekjs xksikyflag ehuk ds chp v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA gekjs }kjk tks eqdnek ntZ djk;k x;k Fkk ftlesa ,Qvkj is'k gq;h Fkh] og jkthukes ds vk/kkj QSlyk gks x;h gSA ysfdu xksikyflag ehuk ds }kjk esjs ,oa esjs HkkbZ ,oa vU; yksxks ds fo:) tks eqdnek ntZ djk;k x;k FkkA mlesa ,d vijk/k jkthukes ;ksX; ugha gksus ls yafcr gSA gekjs ,oa xksikyflag ehuk ds chp mDr vijk/k ds lEcU/k esa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA ge vkSj xksikyflag ehuk mDr eqdnesa esa vc dksbZ dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrs gSA blfy, gekjk jkthukek eatwj fd;k tkdj gekjs f[kykQ py jgs eqdnesa dks fujLr fd;k tk;sA eq>s vkSj dqN ugha dguk gSA uksV & xokg dk c;ku esjs funsZ'ku esa mlds dgs vuqlkj Vad.kdrkZ }kjk dEI;wVj ij Vafdr fd;k x;k] ftls xokg dks i<+dj lquk;k o le>k;k x;k rks mlus mDr dFkuksa dks lqu o le> dj lgh gksuk Lohdkj fd;kA jftLVkj U;kf;dA** ^^jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; ihB] t;iqj ,lŒchŒ fØfeuy felŒ ihfV'ku uEcj 1006@2019 jru ehuk o vU; cuke jktLFkku ljdkj o vU; fnukad 11-02-2019 eSa tru mQZ jksfgr ehuk iq= LoŒ Jh ?ku';ke ehuk] tkfr ehuk] vk;q 26 o"kZ] fuoklh & edku uEcj 4319] xksfoUn jko th jkLrk] vk[kjh pkSjkgk] iqjkuh cLrh t;iqj ftyk & t;iqjA 'kiFkiwoZd c;ku djrk gaw fd xksiky flag ehuk ,oa euh"k ehuk esjs fj'rsnkj gSA lu 2013 esa gekjh ikfjokfjd elys ij dgklquh gks x;h vkSj >xMk gks x;k FkkA ftl dkj.k xksiky flag ehuk us esjs ,oa HkkbZ jru ,oa vU; yksxks ds f[kykQ ukgjx< Fkkus esa ,d eqdnek ntZ djk;k FkkA gekjs }kjk Hkh xksikyflag ehuk ds f[kykQ ukgjx< Fkkus esa ,d eqdnek ntZ djk;k FkkA ftlesa ,Qvkj is'k gks pqdh gSA gekjs xksikyflag ehuk ds chp v/khuLFk U;k;ky; esa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA gekjs }kjk tks eqdnek ntZ djk;k x;k Fkk ftlesa ,Qvkj is'k gq;h Fkh] og jkthukes ds vk/kkj QSlyk gks x;h gSA ysfdu xksikyflag ehuk ds }kjk esjs ,oa esjs HkkbZ ,oa vU; yksxks ds fo:) tks eqdnek ntZ djk;k x;k FkkA mlesa ,d vijk/k jkthukes ;ksX; ugha gksus ls yafcr gSA gekjs ,oa xksikyflag ehuk ds chp mDr vijk/k ds lEcU/k esa jkthukek gks pqdk gSA ge vkSj xksikyflag ehuk mDr eqdnesa esa vc dksbZ dkuwuh dk;Zokgh ugha pkgrs gSA blfy, gekjk jkthukek eatwj fd;k tkdj gekjs f[kykQ py jgs eqdnesa dks fujLr fd;k tk;sA eq>s vkSj dqN ugha dguk gSA uksV & xokg dk c;ku esjs funsZ'ku esa mlds dgs vuqlkj Vad.kdrkZ }kjk dEI;wVj ij Vafdr fd;k x;k] ftls xokg dks i<+dj lquk;k o le>k;k x;k rks mlus mDr dFkuksa dks lqu o le> dj lgh gksuk Lohdkj fd;kA jftLVkj U;kf;dA** 6. It may be noted that in the occurrence simiple injuries were caused and the trial court had already acquitted the petitioners of offences under Sections 323 and 341 IPC. 7. The parties have jointly relied upon Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & Another, (2012) 10 SCC 303 , to contend that that this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can quash the proceedings to advance the interest of justice. 8. After hearing the parties, this Court is of the view that the compromise is finest hour between the parties and this Court ought to grant due sanctity to the amicable resolution of dispute between the parties. 9. Consequently, taking totality of circumstances, and ratio of law laid in the case of Gian Singh (supra), the present petition is accepted and the impugned FIR along with all subsequent proceedings is quashed.