ORDER 1. These appeals are directed against the judgments and orders dated 13.02.2007 and 18.02.2008 passed by the High Court of Guwahati in Writ Petition No.6189 of 2000 and Review Petition No.12 of 2008 respectively. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants-Life Insurance Corporation upon selection of respondent No.1 (Mrinmoy Dutta) had sent offer of appointment to the respondent for the post of Assistant. 3. The respondent joined the Corporation as Assistant in Morgaon Branch on 31.01.1996 and resigned on 21.08.1999 after serving statutory notice, which was accepted by the Corporation. 4. By notification dated 22.06.2000 the Corporation under its Rules revised the pay scales of employees with effect from 01.08.1997. The respondent thereafter approached the Corporation for the revised scale of pay for the period he had worked with the Corporation i.e. from 01.08.1997 to 21.08.1999. 5. By communication dated 09.09.2000, the Corporation rejected the prayer of the respondent on the ground that under the Rules of Corporation, an employee who had resigned from service on or before the date of notification i.e. 22.06.2000 was not eligible for the benefit of the revision. 6. Being aggrieved, the respondent filed writ petition before the High Court of Guwahati. The High Court by its order dated 13.02.2007 allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent and directed the Corporation to pay the revised scales of pay to the respondent with effect from 01.08.1997 to 21.08.1999. Thereafter the Corporation filed a Review Petition before the High Court, which was dismissed on 18.02.2008. 7. Aggrieved by the judgments and orders so passed by the High Court, the Corporation is before us. 8. Heard learned counsel for the appellants. 9. After going through the impugned judgments and orders passed by the High Court as well as the other material available on record, in our opinion, the judgment(s) passed by the High Court in declaring the proviso to Rule 3(1) of Life Insurance Corporation of India Class-III & Class IV Employees (Revision of terms and conditions of service) Amendment Rules, 2000 is absolutely proper and sound. No case for interference is made out. 10. The civil appeals are accordingly dismissed.