JUDGMENT 1. Let name of Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mahtha, the learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2-husband appear in the cause-list. 2. Mrs. Jashodhara Tripathy, the learned counsel appears for the petitioner-wife, who has preferred Transfer Petition (Cr.) No. 2 of 2016 and Mr. Rajesh Kr. Mahtha, the learned counsel appears for the petitioner-husband, who has filed Cr. M. P. No. 917 of 2016 seeking quashing of the entire criminal proceeding arising out of the complaint case being C/1 Case No. 1843 of 2015. 3. The learned counsels appearing for both the parties submits that the parties have amicably settled their disputes and the complainant-wife now does not intend to prosecute the matter further. Both the learned counsels have referred to decision in " Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and anr." reported in (2012) 10 SCC 303 . 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner in Cr. M.P. No. 917 of 2016, on instructions, states that the balance amount which the petitioner is required to pay to his wife in terms of the compromise shall be paid to her on 15.01.2019. 5. Mrs. Jashodhara Tripathy, the learned counsel for the petitioner in Transfer Petition (Cr.) No. 2 of 2016 states that against the order taking cognizance against the petitioner in Sadar P.S. Case No. 695 of 2014, Criminal Revision No. 1439 of 2016 has been filed which is pending in this Court. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner in Cr. M. P. No. 917 of 2016 submits that in terms of the compromise the petitioner also does not intend to prosecute criminal case filed against his wife. 7. Mr. Rajesh Kr. Mahtha, the learned counsel submits that he appears on behalf of O.P. No. 2 in the Criminal Revision No. 1439 of 2016. 8. Post these matters alongwith Criminal Revision No. 1439 of 2016 on 15.01.2019 under the heading "For Final Disposal".