Research › Search › Judgment

Rajasthan High Court · body

2019 DIGILAW 538 (RAJ)

Mujahid Ali v. State of Rajasthan

2019-02-14

ARUN BHANSALI

body2019
JUDGMENT 1. Issue notice. 2. A copy of the writ petition has been served on Ms. Rekha Borana, learned Additional Advocate General. 3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issues raised in the present writ petition are squarely covered by judgment of this Court in Ravi Jajot v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10496/2018, decided on 30.8.2018 and, therefore, the present writ petition may also be decided in terms of the said judgment. 4. In the case of Ravi Jajot (supra), a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court after dealing with the issues, raised therein, inter alia, directed as under:- "92. Before parting with this judgment, this Court makes it clear that any issue other than the issues dealt with by this Court in this judgment, which remains open, shall be represented by the petitioners to the respondents, and the respondents shall decide all those factual and legal issues by passing a respective speaking order in the cases of the petitioners, after giving them proper opportunity of hearing, strictly in accordance with law, as it is not possible for this Court to go into individual facts of individual petitioner in such exercise, and therefore, this Court directs the respondents to pass lawful and speaking orders in all those matters. 94. Such issues shall be decided by the respondents through a proper Redressal Committee to be constituted by the respondents themselves, in pursuance of aforesaid direction contained in this judgment, at the appropriate level, within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this judgment." 5. In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is allowed in terms of judgment in the case of Ravi Jajot (supra) with similar directions as noticed hereinbefore.