JUDGMENT : A.M. Bujor Barua, J. Heard Mr. N Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. AI Ali, learned counsel for the Election Commission of India and Mr. J Payeng, learned counsel for the State of Assam appearing for the Foreigners’ Tribunal and Border Areas, Ms. A Verma, learned standing counsel for the authorities under the NRC as well as Ms. G Sarma, learned counsel for the authorities under the Union of India. 2. Before the Tribunal although the notice was served, the petitioner failed to appear. In the circumstances, the Foreigners’ Tribunal, Dhubri by the order dated 16.03.2000 in FT Case No.81/D/1999 had declared the petitioner to be a foreigner who entered into India between 01.01.1966 to 25.03.1971 and accordingly required him to register before the Regional Foreigners Registration Office of the Dhubri. 3. Although upon being declared to be a person, who came into the territory of India between 01.01.1966 and 25.03.1971, a person is required to register himself/herself with the Regional Foreigners Registration Office of the concerned district, but in the instant case, the petitioner had not done so. As the petitioner was not registered, the authorities sought to deport him from the territory of India and in the said circumstances, this writ petition has been preferred. 4. In this writ petition, the petitioner prays for a direction that he be allowed to register himself before the Regional Foreigners Registration Office as provided under Section 6A(3) of the Citizenship Act of 1955. 5. We have perused the provisions of Section 6A(3) which is as follows: (3) Subject to the provisions of sub-sections (6) and (7), every person of Indian origin who- (a) came to Assam on or after the lst day of January, 1966 but before the 25th day of March, 1971 from the specified territory; and (b) has, since the date of his entry into Assam, been ordinarily resident in Assam; and (c) has been detected to be a foreigner, shall register himself in accordance with the rules made by the Central Government in this behalf under section 18 with such authority (thereafter in this sub-section referred to as the registering authority) as may be specified in such rules and if his name is included in any electoral roll for any Assembly or Parliamentary constituency in force on the date of such detection, his name shall be deleted therefrom. Explanation.-In the case of every person seeking registration under this sub-section, the opinion of the Tribunal constituted under the Foreigners (Tribunals) Order, 1964 holding such person to be a foreigner, shall be deemed to be sufficient proof of the requirement under clause (c) of this sub-section and if any question arises as to whether such person complies with any other requirement under this sub-section, the registering authority shall,- (i) if such opinion contains a finding with respect to such other requirement, decide the question in conformity with such finding; (ii) if such opinion does not contain a finding with respect to such other requirement, refer the question to a Tribunal constituted under the said Order hang jurisdiction in accordance with such rules as the Central Government may make in this behalf under section 18 and decide the question in conformity with the opinion received on such reference. 7. In the instant case, in respect of the order of the Tribunal dated 16.03.2000, it is taken note of that there is no finding of a fact that since the date of his entry into Assam, the petitioner had ordinarily been residing in Assam. The only finding arrived is that the petitioner had entered India between 01.01.1966 and 25.03.1971. As the requirement of the conditions precedent of Section 6 A(3) had not been fulfilled in the case of the petitioner as revealed from the order of the Tribunal, we are of the view that there is a requirement of law to arrive at a finding of fact that the petitioner has ordinarily been residing in Assam since the date of his entry. 8. In view of the above, we are of the view that interest of justice would be met, if the petitioner is required to reappear before the Foreigners Tribunal at Dhubri for a determination as to whether he had been a resident of Assam since the date of his entry between 01.01.1966 and 25.03.1971. 9. For the purpose, the Tribunal may take any further evidence that may be required in order to enable the petitioner to establish that he had ordinarily been a resident in Assam since the date of his entry. For the purpose, the petitioner shall appear before the Tribunal on 21.02.2019 and upon his appearance, the Tribunal shall decide the requirement as indicated above within a period of 30 days thereafter. For the purpose, the petitioner shall appear before the Tribunal on 21.02.2019 and upon his appearance, the Tribunal shall decide the requirement as indicated above within a period of 30 days thereafter. It is provided that in the event, the petitioner do not appear or do not cooperate with the Tribunal, the Tribunal would be at liberty to pass any order as it may deem fit and proper. 10. It is clarified that as in the meantime, as a number of Foreigners Tribunal are in operation in the Dhubri district, the petitioner shall now appear before the Foreigners Tribunal No.1 at Dhubri. 11. In terms of the above, this writ petition stands allowed.