JUDGMENT : 1. The 1st petitioner is the owner of building bearing No.13/508 and the 2nd petitioner is the owner of building bearing No.13/507 on the side of the Irumpanam Refinery Main Road, which is maintained by the Public Works Department. The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to fix No parking board in front of their compound wall and to take appropriate action against the illegal encroachers and also to ensure that there is no parking of any vehicle for a stretch of 30 meters in front of their houses. The petitioners have also sought for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to remove all obstructions for their ingress and egress and their vehicles to their houses. 2. On 09.01.2019, when this writ petition came up for admission, the learned Senior Government Pleader took notice for respondents 1 to 3 and 6. This Court issued urgent notice by speed post to respondents 4 and 5 returnable within two weeks. The learned Senior Government Pleader was directed to get instructions. 3. A counter affidavit has been filed by the 3rd respondent. Paragraphs 5 and 6 of the said counter affidavit read thus; “5. It is submitted that the Petta-KRL Road is a heavy traffic road. The trucks and tanker lorries coming from difference places including national permits vehicles are parking on the side of these road when the parking in the refinery is full. More over both sides of the Petta-KRL road there are some automobile workshops and Hydraulic Work Shops situated situated. Hence the Kerala and other state vehicles coming for repair are also parking on the both sides of that road including the front area of the petitioner's property. 6. It is submitted that the petitioner had lodged a complaint before this respondent on 02.01.2019 regarding unauthorized parking in front of the petitioner's house. It was got enquired and removed the vehicles parked nearby the petitioner's gate. Between the Petitioners' compound wall and tar road there is a road margin having approximately 2 meters width and Drainage having approximately 8 meters width. Hence parking of the vehicle on either side of the petitioner's gate, keeping sufficient distance from the entry point of the gate, will not obstruct ingress and egress of the petitioners. Between the Petitioners' compound wall and tar road there is a road margin having approximately 2 meters width and Drainage having approximately 8 meters width. Hence parking of the vehicle on either side of the petitioner's gate, keeping sufficient distance from the entry point of the gate, will not obstruct ingress and egress of the petitioners. The traffic police erected three No Parking Boards on the Petta-KRL road in front area of petitioner's gate in order to avoid unauthorized parking. True photographs of the road infront of the Petitioner's property produced herewith and marked as Exhibit R3(a). It is submitted that Traffic Police Tripunithura is very vigilant in this type of unauthorized parking cases and Police is initiating action against the drivers who are parking their vehicles unauthorizedly in front of the petitioners house and on that road.” (underline supplied) 4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3, 5 and 6 and also the learned counsel for the 4th respondent. 5. In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 118 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and in supersession of the Rules of the Road Regulations, 1989 the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways issued the Motor Vehicles (Driving) Regulations, 2017. Regulation 5 of the said Regulations deals with duties of drivers and riders. As per sub-regulation (5) of Regulation 5, the driver shall ensure that his vehicle, while moving or when stationary, does not cause any hindrance or undue inconvenience to other road users or to the occupants of any properties. Regulation 22 deals with stopping and parking. As per clause (c) of sub-regulation (2) of Regulation 22, a vehicle shall not be parked on a foot path, cycle track and pedestrian crossing. As per clause (i) of sub-regulation (2), a vehicle shall not be parked in front of the entrance or exit of a property. 6. In Writ Petition (C) No.295 of 2012 filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, by a public-spirited citizen, seeking enforcement of road safety norms and appropriate treatment of accident victims, the Apex Court constituted a 'Committee on Road Safety', vide its order dated 22.04.2014, and notified by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, on 30.05.2014. In the said writ petition the Apex Court delivered a judgment dated 30.11.2017 -S.Rajaseekaran v. Union of India [(2018) 13 SCC 532]. In the said decision, the Apex Court observed that all States and Union Territories are expected to implement the Road Safety Policy with all due earnestness and seriousness. In Para 94.13 of the said decision, in the context of 'Lane Driving', the Apex Court held that the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways has already issued the Motor Vehicles (Driving) Regulations, 2017 which should be implemented by the State Governments and Union Territories strictly. 7. In view of the provisions of the Motor Vehicle (Driving) Regulations, 2017 the driver of a motor vehicle has to ensure that his vehicle, when stationary, does not cause any hindrance or undue inconvenience to other road users or the occupants of any properties; and no vehicle shall be parked in front of the entrance or exit of a property. In such circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the 3rd respondent to ensure strict compliance of the aforesaid provisions under the Motor Vehicles (Driving) Regulations, 2017 thereby preventing parking of any vehicles in front of the entrance of the petitioners' residential buildings. It is made clear that this judgment will not stand in the way of parking of vehicles on the road margin having a width of approximately 2 meters, as evident from Ext.R3(a) photographs, without causing obstruction to vehicular entry to the petitioners' residential buildings and without causing any obstruction to the pedestrians and other road users.