Jahidul Sikdar @ Jaidul Ali @ Jahidul Islam v. State of Assam
2019-06-07
MIR ALFAZ ALI
body2019
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT : Mir Alfaz Ali, J. 1. Heard Mr. S.H. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. A. Begum, learned Addl. PP, appearing for the State. 2. By this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. the petitioner, namely, Jahidul Sikdar @ Jaidul Ali @ Jahidul Islam, has prayed for granting pre-arrest bail in connection with Sarthebari PS Case No. 148/2019 corresponding to GR Case No. 1897/2019 under Sections 448/376 IPC. 3. Case diary called for, is received and perused. 4. The learned Addl. PP has taken me through the case diary. The case diary does not disclose any incriminating material against the petitioner. 5. Considering the materials in the case diary and the nature of allegation, I am of the view that this is a fit case where the petitioner deserves the privilege of pre-arrest bail. 6. Accordingly, it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner in connection with the aforementioned case, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- with a suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority. The pre-arrest bail is subject to the following conditions. (1) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer within 10 days and co-operate with the investigation. (2) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. 7. The petition stands disposed off. Send back the Case diary.