Vasim @ Veeram @ Deny v. State of Rajasthan, Through PP
2019-03-06
G.R. MOOLCHANDANI
body2019
DigiLaw.ai
JUDGMENT 1. Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail in connection with F.I.R. No. 710/2017 registered with Police Station Bhiwadi, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 332, 353, 307, 465, 467, 379, 411 of IPC and Section 16/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act coupled with Sections 3, 5, 8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995 and Section 5/27 of Arms Act. 2. It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is behind the bars since 24.05.2018 and similarly situated two of the accused persons have already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this court, case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable, petitioner has wrongly been implicated and he shall abide by the conditions laid for grant of the bail, so he be also granted bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Petitioner has sought bail in connection with FIR No. 710/2017 registered with Police Station Bhiwadi, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 332, 353, 307, 465, 467, 379, 411 of IPC and Section 16/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act and Sections 3, 5, 8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995 coupled with Section 5/27 of Arms Act. 6. On 01.10.2018 SB Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 12191/2018 was preferred by the petitioner Vasim @ Veeram @ Deny S/o Iqbal, which was withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition. 7. Two of the accused persons, namely 1. Javed @ Jabba S/o Shri Rustam and 2. Ikhlash @ Leelu S/o Shri Aasu, have been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this court vide SB Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 1627/2019 and 1628/2019 on 06.02.2019 respectively. 8. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it would be just and expedient to release the petitioner on bail as well. 9. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case this bail application is allowed. Petitioner be admitted to bail subject to the satisfaction of the trial court. 10. Let a copy of the order be transmitted to the concerned court for necessary compliance.