ORDER 1. Heard counsel for the parties. 2. Perused the judgment of the trial Court as well as the High Court and the relevant record. 3. In view of the concurrent finding of fact recorded by two courts on the factum of exclusive possession of the contraband item with the appellant, we see no reason to deviate from the said conclusion or the finding of guilt recorded against the accused-appellant. In our opinion, no interference is warranted in this appeal, which is filed by the accused-appellant through jail. 4. At the same time, we hasten to record that the sentence awarded by the trial Court vide order dated 29 th July, 2005 is only for a period of seven years rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs.50,000/-, in default to undergo one year additional simple imprisonment. The record also shows that the accused- appellant was arrested on 28th December, 2002 in connection with the stated offence which had occurred on 27th December, 2002. We may assume for the time being that the appellant was released on bail during the trial, even so from the date of the judgment of the trial Court and, in any case, after the judgment of the High Court, and as the present appeal has been filed through jail in the year 2011 and no bail has been granted to him by this Court, it necessarily follows that the accused-appellant must have already fully undergone the sentence period awarded by the trial Court and confirmed by the High Court. Even for that reason nothing more is required to be done in this case. 5. The appeal is accordingly disposed of in the above terms. 6. While parting we must express our appreciation for the able assistance given by the learned Amicus Curiae Mr. R. Nedumaran.