JUDGMENT Magrey, J. - When this matter was taken up for consideration, Mr. Kawoosa, learned counsel appearing for the High Court, sought permission of this Court to place on record Order No. 1444 dated 25.02.2020. 2. Permission granted. Order taken on record. 3. Perusal of the order aforesaid reveals that on the recommendations of the Committee for Appointment and Promotion of Officials/Officers of the High Court Staff, as approved by Honble the Chief Justice, the services of the Adhoc orderlies stand regularized with effect from the dates shown against each in the column of regularization, on having completed their seven years service in pay scale of Rs. 4440-7440+GP 1300(PR) revised Level SL-1 (Rs.14800-47100) against the eight supernumerary posts created by the Government vide order No. 236-JK(LD) 2019 dated 16.12.2019. 4. In terms of order dated 24.12.2019, this Court, on perusal of Government Order No. 236-JK-(LD) of 2019 dated 16.12.2019, directed the Registrar General of the High Court to regularize the services of the petitioners notwithstanding condition No. (i) supraof the Government Order referred to hereinabove. 5. We feel it necessary to take note of order passed by this Court on 24.12.2019:- 'Respondents are stated to have submitted the compliance and a Government order No. 236-JK-(LD) of 2019 dated 16.12.2019 is placed before us in this behalf. We have perused the Government Order which reveals that eight additional posts of Orderlies have been created in the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir. The order has been issued subject to the following conditions:- i. 'These posts shall be used exclusively for regularization of such orderlies whose cases are covered under the provisions of the Jammu & Kashmir Civil Services (Special Provisions) Act, 2010 and recommended by the relevant Empowered Committee. ii. The supernumerary posts so created shall cease to exist once the posts become available in the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir upon retirement on superannuation or promotion or otherwise of any orderly in the High Court, either those regularized against the supernumerary posts or serving on other posts.' The condition no. (i) supra incorporated in the Government Order referred to hereinbefore is not applicable to the High Court, therefore, respondent no. 4 shall, notwithstanding the condition no. (i) of the Government Order supra, regularize the services of the petitioners and place the compliance before us before the next date of hearing.' 6. (i) supra incorporated in the Government Order referred to hereinbefore is not applicable to the High Court, therefore, respondent no. 4 shall, notwithstanding the condition no. (i) of the Government Order supra, regularize the services of the petitioners and place the compliance before us before the next date of hearing.' 6. In compliance of the directions passed by this Court from time to time, with particular reference to order dated 24 th of December, 2020, the respondent No.4 has issued the order of regularization (supra) in favour of the petitioners. 7. Heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the records and considered the matter. 8. In view of the directions passed by this Court from time to time, the settlement of the writ petition has become evident on the creation of the posts by the Government in terms of the Government Order (supra) as also the regularization order issued by respondent No. 4, therefore, we deem it necessary to allow the writ petition and dispose of the same on the following terms: I. Communication dated 10.07.2018, forming Annexure B to the writ petition, shall stand quashed; II. Condition No. (i) of Government Order No.236-JK-(LD) of 2019 dated 16.12.2019, as taken note of in the order passed by this Court on 24.12.2019, is also quashed; and III. Respondent No. 4 is directed torelease all consequential benefits in favour of the petitioners as a sequel to their regularization including salary, increments, seniority, promotion, etc. 9. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly, alongwith all connected CMs.