JUDGMENT Sureshwar Thakur, J. - The apposite part, of, the verdict pronounced, by this Court, in CWP No. 5530 of 2010, along with other connected matters, and, verdicts whereof, are, strived, to be, complied, with, by, the respondents concerned, is, extracted hereinafter:- "2.......In regard to the other petitioner who have not completed four years service on April 2010 and are not possessing 10+2 qualification, their cases shall be considered by the State Government and steps shall be taken for their appropriate training under the scheme of the State Government so that they can be observed as Gramin Vidya Upasak in future. It is ordered accordingly." 2. The petitioners contend, that, all, of, them rather completing, the, requisite training, and, thereupon, they are amenable hence for becoming absorbed, as, Gram Viya Upasaks. 3. In pursuance to the afore directions, becoming meted by this Court, upon, the respondents concerned, the latter furnished, an affidavit before this Court, and, paragraph No.6 thereof, has, become alluded, in, the order recorded, by, this Court on 20.08.2019, para whereof, stands, extracted hereinafter:- "6. That as far as the absorption of these petitioners as Gramin Vidya Upasak is concerned, in this regard, it is submitted that the same being policy decision, is to be taken by the Government and matter has been taken up with the Government vide letter dated 27th February, 2019, which is under consideration. Copy of the same is annexed herewith as Annexure D-3." A circumspect, and, completest reading of the order made by this Court, on 20.08.2019, unveils qua its rendition, occurring, after this Court bearing in mind, paragraph No.6, of, the affidavit, as, became elicited, from, the respondents concerned, and, paragraph whereof, stands extracted hereinabove, (a) and, wherein, clear underscorings, are borne,vis-a-vis, the government concerned, processing the finalization, of its, hence meteing, the, apposite completest compliance, vis-a-vis, those petitioners, who had meted satiation, vis-a-vis, the requirements, enshrined, in, the verdict recorded, by, this Court in CWP No. 5530 of 2010 (along with other connected matters), (b) inasmuch, as, vis-a-vis, those petitioners hence completing, the apposite period of training, for, thereafter theirs being considered for absorption, against, the post of Gramin Vidya Upasaks. However, subsequently, Mr. However, subsequently, Mr. Surender Negi, District Attorney, in, the Office of the Directorate, of, Elementary Education, furnished, an affidavit, with echoing borne therein, hence, unfolding qua, in, SLP No. 1426 of 2015, and, also in SLP No. 3320 of 2015, SLP No. 3600 of 2015, the Hon'ble Apex Court, respectively making directions, for, status quo being maintained, by, the respondents concerned. Moreover, therein, it has also become articulated, that, with the Hon'ble Apex Court, in, SLP No.1426 of 2015, making a direction rather, upon, the respondents concerned, "to make any appointment by following the competitive method/procedure by giving equal opportunity to all the eligible candidates", (c) thereupon, it becomes contended, that, since the absorption, of, the petitioners, as, Gramin Vidya Upasak, is, not a direction embodied therein, and, also, with the Hon'ble Apex Court, in, SLP No.1426 of 2015, hence reserving a limited liberty, vis-a-vis, the respondent/State concerned, to make any appointment, by following the competitive method/procedure, by giving equal opportunity, to, all the eligible candidates, (d) rather, hence thereupons, the implementation(s), of, the afore verdicts, though, uncontrovertedly attaining, hence, binding, and, conclusive effect, for, want, of, theirs becoming assailed, before the Hon'ble Apex Court, rather per se becoming stalled, reiteratedly on, anvil, of, the Hon'ble Apex Court, in, SLP Nos.3320 of 2015, 3600 of 2015, rendering directions, vis-a-vis, the respondent/State, maintaining status quo or it only granting, the, afore limited liberty, to, the respondents/State. 4. Be that as it may, this Court, is, to deal with the extant lis, with extreme care, and, caution, since, it became incumbent, upon, this Court, to ensure its meteing, the, deepest reverence, vis-a-vis, the afore orders, as, pronounced, by, the Hon'ble Apex Court. However, to the considered mind, of, this Court, the afore directions rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP Nos. However, to the considered mind, of, this Court, the afore directions rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP Nos. 1426 of 2015, 3600 of 2015, and, in SLP No. 3320 of 2015, do not, contain any controversy, hence, bearing any similarity, with the verdict(s), as, become, strived to be implemented, by, the petitioners herein, (a) and, further also this Court, holds a bonafide, and, clear view, that, the verdict(s), as, strived to be implemented, do visibly, acquire the apposite binding, and, conclusive effect, (b) unless its/theirs being set aside, by, the Hon'ble Apex Court, (c) Apparently, the vigour, of, the afore conclusion also becomes strengthened, upon, the respondents/State, rather not bringing forth, any material, hence suggestive, vis-a-vis, the strived, to be, implemented verdict(s), becoming challenged, or, operation thereof, becoming stayed, by, the Hon'ble Apex Court, (d) nor any material surges forth, at this stage, qua, in, the lis extantly engaging the Hon'ble Apex Court, and, in, the extant lis, as, engaging this Court, hence, there occurring any apposite similarity, nor any material surges forth, hence, suggestive, that even, in, the, subjudice lis, before the Hon'ble Apex Court, any, direction, becoming made, upon, the respondents concerned, for, the latter, not, implementing the afore strived, to be, implemented verdict(s), (e) verdict(s) whereof, for the reasons aforestated acquire conclusivity, and, also binding force. Consequently, with there being gross distinctivity, inter se the lis at hand, and, in the lis subjudice, hence, before the Hon'ble Apex Court, and, also when the petitioners, are, under the apposite scheme, after, theirs completing, the, requisite training, hence, vested with an entitlement, for, their absorption, as, Gramin Vidya Upasaks, (f) and, besides when do not belong, to the category appertaining, to, the competing category, facilitated, to take, the, competitive examination, under, the orders rendered, by, the Hon'ble Apex Court, for, filling up, the, post of JBT, (g) contrarily when hereat, the, petitioner are claiming their absorption, under, an, judicially validated scheme, besides, are, eligible, thereupon, also the afore verdict(s), relied, upon, by the State cannot stall, the respondents, from, hence, theirs implementing the strived, for, conclusive, and, binding verdict. Consequently, the extant application is allowed, and, the respondents are directed to mete, the, apposite hence completest compliance, within, three weeks from today. Moreover, given the respondents, purging, through, a, purported tangible reason, for, theirs not complying, vis-a-vis, the, apposite verdict(s), thereupon, they, are, discharged.