Research › Search › Judgment

Telangana High Court · body

2020 DIGILAW 123 (TS)

Atteveli Vishnu Prasad v. State Of Telangana

2020-01-28

G.SRI DEVI

body2020
JUDGMENT G. Sri Devi, J. - This Criminal Petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.), is filed by the petitioners/A-2 to A-4, for grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.463 of 2019 of P.S. Musheerabad, Hyderabad District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners/A-2 to A-4, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondentState and perused the record. 3. In the FIR, it is inter alia stated that on the basis of the report of the de facto complainant, a case was registered against the petitioners herein and A-1, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody in another criminal case. The petitioners and A-1 alleged to have cheated the de facto complainant and other public by taking away huge amounts from them under the pretext of Micro Finance Business and alleged to be threatening them to file false cases against them. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners/A-2 to A-4 would submit that the petitioners/A-2 to A-4 are falsely implicated in this case and all the allegations made against them are false. It is further submitted that the petitioners are ready to furnish sufficient sureties to the satisfaction of this Court and ready to co-operate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners/A-2 to A-4. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners/A-2 to A-4 stating that there are several cases pending against them. 6. As seen from the contents of the F.I.R., there are specific and serious allegations against the petitioners/A-2 to A-4 with regard to cheating and misappropriation of money of the de facto complainant and others and multiple criminal cases are pending against them. 7. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of the offence, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners/A-2 to A-4. 8. The Criminal Petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 9. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed.