Research › Search › Judgment

Punjab High Court · body

2020 DIGILAW 1280 (PNJ)

Riya Sharma v. State Of Punjab

2020-06-11

AMOL RATTAN SINGH

body2020
JUDGMENT Amol Rattan Singh, J. - All the cases listed today have been taken up for hearing by way of video conferencing because of the situation existing due to the Covid-19 pandemic. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioners are seeking protection of their lives and liberty at the hands of respondents No.4 and 5, who are stated to be the parents of petitioner no.2, on account of the fact that they have married each other of their own free will, against the wishes of the said respondents on 26.05.2020. Photographs of what is stated to be a marriage ceremony have been annexed with the petition. 3. As regards proof of age of the petitioners, copies of their Matriculation Certificate and Aadhaar Card have been annexed with the petition as Annexures P-1 and P-2 respectively. 4. On a specific query put to learned counsel for the petitioners, it has been stated that neither are the petitioners in any prohibited relationship to each other, nor has any of them been married earlier. 5. Consequently, since protection of life and liberty is a fundamental right of every citizen under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, without making any comment on the validity of the marriage, or otherwise, this petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.2 and 3, to ensure that the lives and liberty of the petitioners are not put to any harm or threat at the hands of the aforesaid respondents, or at their behest. 6. However, it is made clear that as petitioner no.2, even as per the petition itself, is shown to be below the legally marriageable age for males, proceedings under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, shall be initiated against him as per law. 7. With the aforesaid observations, this petition is disposed of.