JUDGMENT N.S.Sanjay Gowda, J. - The claimants, being dissatisfied with the compensation of Rs.7,65,000/-, are in appeal. 2. In this case, the factum of the accident is not in dispute and it is also not in dispute that the vehicle in question was not insured and therefore, no liability is fastened against the Insurance Company. 3. The Tribunal by the impugned award has granted a sum of Rs.7,65,000/- as a compensation for the death of one V.Suresh. In determining the said compensation, the Tribunal has taken the income of the deceased at Rs.5,000/- per month and applied the multiplier of 16' to arrive the figure of Rs.7,20,000/-. 4. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the appellants that the Tribunal ought to have added future prospects in accordance with the decision of the Apex Court in the case NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED Vs. PRANAY SETHI, (2017) 16 SCC 680 . He also submits that the sums awarded on the other heads are also inadequate and required to be enhanced. 5. Notice of this appeal against the 1st respondent-Driver was held sufficient and notice to the 2nd respondent was dispensed with. 6. The Apex Court in Pranaya Sethi's Case referred to supra has held that in the case of claims arising out of the death, future prospects would also have to be applied. In the instant case, the Tribunal has committed an error in not adding the future prospects. As a consequence, a factor of 40% is added to his monthly income. Since the deceased was 34 years old, this would result in his monthly income to be at Rs.7,000/-. Out of the said sum, 1/4 is to be deducted which results in his monthly income to be at Rs.5,250/-. As the deceased was 34 years old, a multiplier of 16' would have to be adopted. This would result in a sum of Rs.5250 x 12 x 16 = 10,08,000/- to be awarded towards 'loss of dependency' . 7. As held by the Apex Court in Pranay Sethi's case referred to supra, a sum of Rs.33,000/- is to be awarded under the conventional heads. 8. The claimants are the wife, two minor children and parents. 9. In accordance with the ratio laid down in MAGMA GENERAL INSURANCE OCMPANY Vs. 7. As held by the Apex Court in Pranay Sethi's case referred to supra, a sum of Rs.33,000/- is to be awarded under the conventional heads. 8. The claimants are the wife, two minor children and parents. 9. In accordance with the ratio laid down in MAGMA GENERAL INSURANCE OCMPANY Vs. NANU RAM @ CHUHRU RAM, (2018) ACJ 2782 , each of the claimants would be entitled to a sum of Rs.40,000/- i.e. total sum of Rs.2,00,000/-. Thus, the claimants would be entitled for the following: Sl. No. Particulars Amount in (Rs.) 1. Loss of dependency 10,08,000 2. Conventional heads 33,000 3. Loss of consortium 2,00,000 Total 12,41,000 10. The enhanced amount shall carry interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of petition till its realization. The appeal is allowed in part .