JUDGMENT Shivashankar Amarannavar, J. - This petition is filed by the accused under Section 439 of The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Cr.P.C.', for brevity) seeking bail in Crime No.235/2019 of Kakati Police Station (S.C. No.65/2020) registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376 and 506 of The Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as the 'IPC', for brevity) and Sections 2, 4, 6 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as the 'POCSO Act', for brevity) 2. The case of the prosecution is that one Smt.Rajashree, w/o Sanju Desar, filed a written complaint alleging that she is residing in Kadoli village since last 10 years with her husband Sanju and they have two children i.e., the victim, aged 7 yeas and Yash, aged 4 years and her daughter-victim is studying in 1st standard in Marathi Primary school in the same village and her son Yash is studying in Anganawadi. Her husband is running a hair cut saloon and she goes for coolie work. They are residing in the house of one Vasant Sanadi on rental basis. Her husband is originally from Budihal village of Bailhongal taluk and she also knows the petitioner/accused-Sunil Balu Bhainaik, who is from the same area and he is the driver of the goods vehicle and he takes her both children for playing in the street. It is further alleged that on 11/12/2019 at about 7.00 am her husband had gone to his saloon and her daughter-victim, went to school at 10.00 clock. She completed her work and went for coolie work to the field of the petitioner. After completing the work she returned home at 6.30 pm and her husband and children were at home. Her daughter was crying holding her stomach and when enquired she told that at about 5.30 pm the petitioner had taken their children for playing and as they did not return for long time, he started searching and went to the cattle shed of the petitioner and his son was playing outside in a tempo and when he asked him about the victim, he pointed finger towards the cattle shed. He went to the cattle shed, saw the door was closed and called his daughter and found her crying in the cattle shed. He went to the cattle shed, saw the door was closed and called his daughter and found her crying in the cattle shed. Upon opening the door, he saw her pant was removed and Sunil was standing near the door. He brought both the children to the house. At that time it was about 6.00 pm. The complainant also enquired with the victim and brought her to Belagavi Civil Hospital for treatment. She filed a complaint stating that the petitioner committed sexual offence on her daughter-victim. The complaint came to be registered in Crime No.235/2019 of Kakati Police Station for an offence punishable under Section 376 of IPC and Sections 2, 4, 6 and 8 of the POCSO Act and the case is now pending in S.C. No.65/2020 before the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Belagavi. The petitioner filed bail application in Crl.Misc. No.41/2020 before the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Belagavi and the same came to be rejected on 29.06.2020. Therefore, the petitioner is before this Court seeking bail. 3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the incident had taken place on 11.12.2019 and the complaint came to be filed on 12.12.2019 at 2.15 hours and there is a delay in filing the complaint. It is his further submission that the victim in her statement has stated that the petitioner removed her dress and laid on her. It is his further submission that under Section 164 Cr.P.C. statement, the victim has stated not only the present incident but also with regard to the incident 4 days prior to the present incident. It is his further submission that in the opinion given by the Doctor, it is mentioned that there are no evidence and signs available of recent sexual assault other than the history. It is his further submission that the petitioner's mother is a Gram Panchayat member and there is political rivalry between the petitioner's family and the family of the victim. It is his further submission that the father of the victim gave false complaint against the parents of the petitioner regarding kidnapping the victim from the hospital in Belgaum. It is his further submission that the petitioner's mother has to undergo uterus operation and his sister is physically handicapped. It is his further submission that the father of the victim gave false complaint against the parents of the petitioner regarding kidnapping the victim from the hospital in Belgaum. It is his further submission that the petitioner's mother has to undergo uterus operation and his sister is physically handicapped. It is his further submission that charge sheet has been filed and the presence of the petitioner is not required for any custodial interrogation. With these, he prayed for allowing the petition. 5. Per contra, learned High Court Government Pleader submitted that the date of birth of the victim is 28.04.2013 and she was aged 6 years 8 months as on the date of the offence. It is her further submission that the medical certificate reveal that hymen of the victim is ruptured and old tear is also seen. It is her further submission that in the statement recorded by the Judicial Magistrate under Section 164 Cr.P.C., the victim has clearly stated regarding the sexual assault by the petitioner on her not only on the date of the incident but also 4 days prior to the date of incident. It is her further submission that CW-7-father of the victim and CW.10-a neighbour are the eyewitnesses to the incident. It is her further submission that charge sheet materials reveal prima facie case against the petitioner. It is her further submission that, if, the petitioner is granted bail, he will tamper the prosecution witnesses and flee from justice. With this, she prayed to dismiss the petition. 6. Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader, this Court has gone through the charge sheet records. 7. The victim is less than 7 years old as on the date of the incident and her date of birth is 28.04.2013. the victim, in her statement before the police and also in her statement recorded by the Judicial Magistrate under Section 164 of Cr.P.C., has clearly stated that the petitioner took her to the cattle shed and removed her clothes and laid on her and committed sexual assault. The medical certificate reveal hymen rupture and old tear is also seen. The very said medical certificate corroborates the statement of the victim girl. The father of the victim and CW-10-neighbour are the eyewitnesses to the incident. 8. The medical certificate reveal hymen rupture and old tear is also seen. The very said medical certificate corroborates the statement of the victim girl. The father of the victim and CW-10-neighbour are the eyewitnesses to the incident. 8. Looking to the entire charge sheet materials there is prima facie case against the petitioner for the offences alleged. The petitioner has not made out any ground for grant of bail. Accordingly, the petition is rejected.