ORDER 1. These writ petitions have been filed by the petitioner aggrieved against the orders dated 17/9/2019 passed by the trial court in the suit as well as Temporary Injunction application, whereby, the applications filed by the respondent plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 CPC were accepted. 2. The respondent filed a suit for declaration of sale deed dated 27/6/2016 as null and void. During the pendency of the suit, an application was filed seeking to indicate that the plaintiff was threatened by the petitioner seeking to evict her from the suit property and, therefore, besides seeking amendment in the plaint, relief was also sought to be amended. 3. The application was contested by the petitioner alleging that the plaintiff was seeking to plug the loopholes left in the pleadings, which is not permissible. However, the trial court accepted the application and permitted the amendment. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial court was not justified in accepting the application filed by the respondent inasmuch as the plea raised was ipse dixit as no specific cause of action was indicated and, therefore, acceptance of the application was not justified. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent supported the order impugned. 6. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and have perused the material available on record. 7. Looking to the nature of amendment sought, whereby, the plaintiff wanted to incorporate the subsequent developments, the trial court, in the circumstances of the case, was justified in permitting the amendment in the plaint, as denial would have lead to multiplicity of proceedings. 8. In view thereof, no case for interference in the orders impugned is made out under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 9. Consequently, the writ petitions have no substance and the same are, therefore, dismissed.