JUDGMENT 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, as the very outset submits that identically situated person namely Mr. Vinod Kumar Chobisa, has been accorded notional benefits from 28 th Jan., 2008, whereas the petitioners, who were identically situated, have been declined the same treatment and thus, the action of the State respondents is discriminatory and in violation to the mandate of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. 2. Learned counsel further submits that for the present, the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State- respondents are directed to consider and decide the representation within a time frame in the backdrop of order dated 7 th May, 2013, wherein benefits on notional basis have been accorded to Mr. Vinod Kumar Chobisa. 3. In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioners to address a comprehensive representation to the respondents within two weeks hereinafter. 4. In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than three months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off. 6. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.