Research › Search › Judgment

Telangana High Court · body

2020 DIGILAW 230 (TS)

M. A. Kaleem v. State Of Telangana

2020-02-06

G.SRI DEVI

body2020
JUDGMENT G. Sri Devi, J. - This Criminal Revision Case is filed aggrieved by the order dated 31.12.2018 passed by the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of Jubilee Hills car bomb Blast Case-cumFamily Court-cum-XXIII Additional Chief Judge-cum-IX AMSJ, Hyderabad, in Crl.M.P.No.945 of 2018 in M.C.No.126 of 2018. 2. By the impugned order, the lower Court had allowed the aforesaid application filed by respondent Nos.2 to 5 herein under Section 125(1) Cr.P.C. seeking interim maintenance and directed the revision petitioner herein to pay Rs. 7,000/- per month to respondent No.2 and Rs. 3,000/- each to respondent Nos.3 to 5 per month from the date of the said petition. 3. Though several grounds are raised for quashing of the impugned order, at the hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner restricted his prayer to reduce the quantum of maintenance payable by the revision petitioner herein. 4. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, without delving into the merits, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of and the impugned order is modified to extent that the revision petitioner shall pay Rs. 13,000/- per month to respondent Nos.2 to 5 towards interim maintenance on or before 5th of every month and he shall also pay the arrears of maintenance @ Rs. 13,000/- per month, which is stated to be due from July, 2019 onwards, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Respondent No.2 is entitled to withdraw the deposited amount on her behalf and on behalf of the children i.e., respondent Nos.3 to 5. 5. Learned counsel appearing for both parties sought for a direction to the Court below to dispose of the aforesaid M.C. expeditiously. 6. As the main M.C. is of the year 2018, the lower Court is directed to dispose of the aforesaid M.C. on its file expeditiously, preferably within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. Subject to the above directions, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. No order as to costs. 8. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall also stand closed.