Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2020 DIGILAW 279 (GAU)

Dhruba Gogoi @ Dhrubajyoti Gogoi v. State Of Assam

2020-02-26

RUMI KUMARI PHUKAN

body2020
JUDGMENT 1. By this application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the petitioners, namely, 1.Dhruba Gogoi @ Dhrubajyoti Gogoi and 2. Brajen Gogoi @ Brojen Dohutia have sought for pre-arrest bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Mariani P.S. Case No. 12/2020, under Sections 325/384/387/436/507 of the IPC. 2. Heard learned counsels for both the sides. 3. The case diary has been produced today and considered the submission of the learned counsel for both the parties. 4. Materials in the case diary reflects that there are some hot altercation between the informant and the accused persons for running the Komar Khal in their premises which was raising sound/noise and the offence does not attract under Section 436/487 of the IPC against the present 2(two) accused. 5. It is the statement of some of the informants that one Rupam Gogoi who actually demanded some money from the informant. And there is no involvement of the accused petitioner against the demand. 6. Considering all entirety of the matter, the accused petitioner aforesaid is granted interim pre- arrest bail. In the event of his arrest in connection with the aforesaid case he shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-, with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority with further direction to the petitioner to appear before the IO within a period of 15 days from today and he shall cooperate with the investigation with the case.