Sumalatha v. State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary
2020-01-08
P.KESHAVA RAO
body2020
DigiLaw.ai
ORDER : 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. The prayer sought in the writ petition is as under: “For the reasons stated in the writ affidavit this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No. 4 in not taking any steps to proceed with the investigation in FIR No. 371 of 2013 registered against Respondent Nos. 5 to 9 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution of India apart from being violative of the provisions of Criminal Procedure Code and consequently direct the Respondent No. 4 to complete the investigation in FIR No. 371 of 2013 by fixing a time frame and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 3. Learned Government Pleader brought to the notice of this Court that pursuant to registration of Crime No. 371 of 2013, the investigation was completed and a charge sheet was filed on 30.09.2014 vide S.R. No. 6870 of 2014 before the concerned Court. 4. In that view of the matter, particularly in the light of the relief sought in the writ petition, this Court is of the opinion that no further cause would survive for adjudication in the writ petition and the same is liable to be dismissed. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.