JUDGMENT Ravindra Maithani, J. - Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is preferred seeking directions that the petitioner may be released, on his executing two sureties in all 94 cases because it is not possible for the petitioner to arrange 188 sureties in all 94 cases. The list of cases, in which, according to the petitioner, he has been granted bail, is given in para nos. 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the petition. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that petitioner is involved in 94 cases in District Dehradun and he has been granted bail in all these cases, but he is unable to secure his release because he is not in a position to get 188 sureties. 4. No law requires that separate sureties be produced, in each case. The same set of sureties may stand surety to the petitioner, in all 94 cases. It is all question of satisfaction of the Magistrate. It is also a tragedy that a person is unable to secure his release, due to his inability to secure securities. 5. In the instant case, the grievance of the petitioner is that he is not able to bring 188 persons as sureties in all 94 cases. What he wants is that two sureties may be taken in all the 94 cases. This may be done provided, the sureties are reliable. 6. The petitioner may produce only two persons as sureties in all the 94 cases provided that they are reliable to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 7. With the above observation, the instant petition stands disposed of.