JUDGMENT Jay Sengupta, J. - This is an application seeking an expeditious disposal of a proceeding in which a charge-sheet was submitted under Sections 307, 323, 494 and 498A read with Section 34 of the Penal Code. 2. Mr. Imran Ali and Mr. Pratik Bose, learned advocates who are present in Court today and who ordinarily appear on behalf of the State are requested to represent the State in this case. A copy of the revisional application is served upon them in Court. Their engagement may be regularised by the competent authority of the State in due course. 3. A certified copy of the order sheet filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. The petitioner is the defacto complainant and the victim in the present case. Although the First Information Report was lodged as far back as in 2015, a charge-sheet submitted in 2016. Till date, even the charges could not be framed. There are five witnesses in this case. The proceeding has remained pending for an unduly long time for no fault on the part of the petitioner. 5. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the State and have perused the revision petition. 6. No prejudice will be caused to anyone if a direction is passed for an expeditious disposal of the impugned proceeding. 7. It appears that the proceeding has remained pending for an inordinately long time. Till date, even charges could not be framed. 8. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the learned trial court is requested to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties, preferably within a period of one year from the next date of hearing. 9. With these observations, the revisional application is disposed of. 10. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.