JUDGMENT Jay Sengupta, J. - This is an application seeking an expeditious disposal of a proceeding in which a charge-sheet was submitted under Sections 406 and 498A read with Section 34 of the Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 2. Mr. Swapan Banerjee and Ms. Sayanti Santra, learned advocates who are present in Court today and who ordinarily appear on behalf of the State, are requested to represent the State in this case. A copy of the revisional application is served upon them in Court. Their engagement may be regularised by the competent authority of the State in due course. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits as follows. The petitioners are the accused in this case. Although the First Information Report was lodged in 2010, a charge-sheet was submitted only in 2014. The proceeding has not been concluded as yet. Out of eleven witnesses, only three have been examined till date. The proceeding has remained pending for no fault on the part of the petitioners. 4. I have heard the submissions of the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the State and have perused the revision petition. 5. No prejudice will be caused to anyone if a direction is passed for an expeditious disposal of the impugned proceeding. 6. It appears that the proceeding has remained pending for an inordinately long time. 7. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the learned trial court is requested to conclude the trial as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties, preferably within a period of one year from the next date of hearing. 8. With these observations, the revisional application is disposed of. 9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.