JUDGMENT Hon'ble Ravi Malimath, ACJ. Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J. (Via Video Conferencing) Aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge in dismissing the writ petition while relegating the writ petitioner to the alternative remedy of filing the writ petition under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, the petitioner is in appeal. 2. Learned Single Judge while considering the case of the petitioner relied on the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in the case of Kanaiyalal Lalchand Sachdev & others vs. State of Maharashtra & others (2011) 2 SCC 782 as well as Union Bank of India vs. Satyawati Tondon 2010 (8) SCC 110 and came to the conclusion that the petitioner has alternative remedy under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act and hence, declined to entertain the writ petition. 3. On considering the contentions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, we do not find any error committed by the learned Single Judge that calls for any interference. The order passed by the learned Single Judge is in accordance with law and hence, calls for no interference. 4. Consequently, the appeal, being devoid of merit, is dismissed accordingly.