Research › Search › Judgment

Uttarakhand High Court · body

2020 DIGILAW 490 (UTT)

Siem Offshore Inc v. The Deputy Director Of Income Tax

2020-11-24

RAVI MALIMATH, RAVINDRA MAITHANI

body2020
JUDGMENT Ravi Malimath, A.C.J. - The following substantial questions of law arise for consideration in this appeal: "a. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal erred in law in holding that the charges amounting to Rs.5,88,57,523/- received by the appellant on account of vessel operated outside India were to be included in calculating the aggregate amount referred to in sub-section (2) of Section 44BB of the Act. b. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal erred in law in holding that the reimbursement of actual charges amounting to Rs.64,12,645/- received by the appellant were to be included in calculating the aggregate amount referred to in sub-section (2) of Section 44BB of the Act". 2. Learned counsels submit that the substantial questions of law have already been answered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and others,376 ITR 306. 3. In view of the submissions made, the appeal is disposed off. The substantial questions of law are answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee by following the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and others,376 ITR 306.