JUDGMENT T. Vinod Kumar, J. - The present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issue of a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of 4th respondent in interfering in the civil dispute of the petitioner pending before this Court in Writ Petition No.8625 of 2015, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust. 2. The above case is taken up for hearing today i.e., 14.07.2020, through Video Conferencing. 3. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar Veerjala, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for the respondents. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner drawing attention of this Court to the interim order passed in WPMP No.11381 of 2015 in WP No.8625 of 2015 whereby this Court while permitting the petitioner to take out notice to the 5th respondent therein, directed both the parties to maintain status quo obtaining as on 13.03.2015 with respect to entries in the revenue records. It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that despite the petitioner being in possession of the land by virtue of the above status quo order granted by this Court, the 4th respondent is calling the petitioner to the police station and making him sit in the police station, thereby interfering in the civil disputes pending between the petitioner and one Datla Venkatappaiah, who is the 5th respondent in Writ Petition No.8625 of 2015, thereby interfering in the civil dispute, which the 4th respondent lacks jurisdiction. 5. The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home has forwarded to this Court by e-mail written instructions dated 11.07.2020 under the signature of 4th respondent-Sub.Inspector of Police, Ananthagiri Police Station, Suryapet District. By the said written instructions, it is stated that on 19.06.2020 one Datla Venkatappaiah gave a complaint stating that there is a land situated in Survey No.51/2 of Vasanthapuram Village Revenue limits, in which he is residing and had pattadar passbook in his favour. On 16.06.2020 at 16:00 hours one Banala Krishna Chary and others trespassed into his land and picked up quarrel and abused him in filthy language, beat his daughter with sticks and stones on her hands and legs and threatened with dire consequences, due to which his daughter sustained bleeding injuries and requested the 4th respondent authority to register a case and cause enquiry. 6. 6. By the written instructions, it is stated that on receiving the said complaint, the 4th respondent authority registered a case vide Crime No.71 of 2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 324, 504, 506 read with Section 34 IPC of Ananthagiri Police Station and took up investigation in the said case, wherein the petitioner is arrayed as accused No.1. 7. By the said written instructions, it is further stated that except investigating into the above said case registered, the respondent police authorities never interfered in the civil disputes of the petitioner at any point of time. It is also stated that keeping in mind the above case, the petitioner has come up with the present writ petition to bring pressure on the respondent police authorities and to divert them from investigating into the above case registered against the petitioner and others. 8. Having regard to the submissions made as above, since it is stated that the respondent police authorities are not interfering in the civil disputes between the petitioner herein and 5th respondent in WP No.8625 of 2015, except investigating into the case, vide Crime No.71 of 2020 of Ananthagiri Police Station registered against the petitioner, it is needless to mention that the respondent police authorities shall conduct investigation into the above said crime strictly in accordance with law. 9. Subject to the above observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 10. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed in the light of this final order.